Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 22;15(2):e094712.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094712.

Prolonged versus single dose in penicillin oral challenge testing: protocols for a pilot and definitive randomised controlled trial (PROSPECTOR studies)

Affiliations

Prolonged versus single dose in penicillin oral challenge testing: protocols for a pilot and definitive randomised controlled trial (PROSPECTOR studies)

Irvin Ng et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Penicillin allergy labels (PALs) are reported in 1 in 10 hospitalised patients globally and associated with inferior patient, hospital and microbiological outcomes; however, the majority are incorrect and should be removed. Direct oral penicillin challenge has been demonstrated to be a safe and effective method for the removal of PALs. However, the question of whether a single dose is sufficient to ascertain true allergy status remains unanswered, with some studies suggesting that extended challenges of 3 or more days are superior for the exclusion of delayed immune reactions. The aim of the PROSPECTOR studies was to determine the feasibility (PROSPECTOR-1) of a definitive trial (PROSPECTOR-2) to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of prolonged oral challenge (ie, 5 days) versus single-dose oral challenge in patients with a delayed or unknown penicillin allergy phenotype (PROSPECTOR-2).

Methods and analysis: A pair of double-blind two-arm parallel placebo-controlled trials will be undertaken-PROlonged versus Single dose in PEnicillin oral Challenge Testing double-blind parallel group randomised placebo-cOntrolled tRial (PROSPECTOR Studies). Patients with a reported delayed or unknown timing penicillin allergy who have passed a supervised single-dose oral amoxicillin challenge (with or without prior skin testing/single or split dose) will be recruited. Informed patient consent will be granted for sites to recruit patients and collect routine clinical data. PROSPECTOR-1 will assess the safety and feasibility of a placebo-controlled trial for single-dose amoxicillin challenge versus 5-day prolonged oral challenge. PROSPECTOR-2 will assess the superiority of the 5-day prolonged oral challenge compared with single-dose amoxicillin challenge in excluding a delayed immune reaction. PROSPECTOR-2 will commence immediately post completion of PROSPECTOR-1 in a vanguard design, with adjustments to the projected sample size for superiority made following completion of PROSPECTOR-1. PROSPECTOR-2 will commence recruitment immediately following closure of PROSPECTOR-1; however, data from each trial will be analysed separately.

Ethics and dissemination: These studies were reviewed and approved by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (PROSPECTOR-1: HREC/99740/Austin-2023 and PROSPECTOR-2: HREC/109785/Austin-2024). The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant conferences.

Trial registration number: PROSPECTOR-1: ACTRN12623001242617 and PROSPECTOR-2: ACTRN12624001107516.

Keywords: Antibiotics; Clinical Trial; IMMUNOLOGY; PUBLIC HEALTH; Protocols & guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study design for PROSPECTOR-1 (PROlonged versus Single dose in PEnicillin oral Challenge Testing double-blind parallel-group randomised placebo-cOntrolled tRial) and PROSPECTOR-2 studies. apenicillin ‘unspecified’, penicillin VK, penicillin G, amoxicillin, ampicillin, flucloxacillin, dicloxacillin, cloxacillin, mecillinam, pivmecillinam and pivampicillin. BID, two times a day.

References

    1. Trubiano JA, Cairns KA, Evans JA, et al. The prevalence and impact of antimicrobial allergies and adverse drug reactions at an Australian tertiary centre. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:572. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1303-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trubiano JA, Chen C, Cheng AC, et al. Antimicrobial allergy “labels” drive inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing: lessons for stewardship. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:1715–22. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Picard M, Bégin P, Bouchard H, et al. Treatment of patients with a history of penicillin allergy in a large tertiary-care academic hospital. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013;1:252–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borch JE, Andersen KE, Bindslev-Jensen C. The prevalence of suspected and challenge-verified penicillin allergy in a university hospital population. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;98:357–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_230.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Day C, Mendelson M, Peter J, et al. Low self-reported penicillin allergy in South Africa-implications for global public health response. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2023;5:dlad015. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources