Left Ventricular Entry to Reduce Brain Lesions During Catheter Ablation: A Randomized Trial
- PMID: 39989365
- PMCID: PMC12375378
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071352
Left Ventricular Entry to Reduce Brain Lesions During Catheter Ablation: A Randomized Trial
Abstract
Background: Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias, one of the most rapidly growing procedures in cardiac electrophysiology, is associated with magnetic resonance imaging-detected brain lesions in more than half of cases. Although a retrograde aortic approach is conventional, modern tools enable entry through a transseptal approach that may avoid embolization of debris from the arterial system. We sought to test the hypothesis that a transseptal puncture would mitigate brain injury compared with a retrograde aortic approach.
Methods: The TRAVERSE trial (Transseptal Versus Retrograde Aortic Ventricular Entry to Reduce Systemic Emboli) was a multicenter randomized controlled comparative effectiveness trial. Patients with left ventricular arrhythmias undergoing catheter ablation procedures were randomly assigned to a transseptal puncture approach compared (1:1) with a retrograde aortic approach. The primary outcome was the presence of an acute brain lesion detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary outcomes included clinically manifest complications, procedural efficacy, and 6-month neurocognitive assessments.
Results: Among the 62 patients randomly assigned to a retrograde aortic approach with postoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging, 28 (45%) exhibited an acute brain lesion compared with 19 of the 69 (28%) of those randomized to a transseptal puncture (P=0.036). No differences in clinically manifest complications or procedural efficacy were observed. More patients in the retrograde aortic arm were categorized as having a high likelihood of cognitive impairment at 6 months (33% compared with 19% of those in the transseptal arm), but substantial loss to follow-up was present.
Conclusions: Among patients undergoing left ventricular catheter ablation procedures, a transseptal approach reduced the risk of acute brain lesions by nearly half compared with a retrograde aortic approach without sacrificing safety or efficacy. Given a likely embolic pathogenesis, the brain magnetic resonance imaging findings may reflect a propensity to other organ damage; these findings may extend to other procedures requiring left ventricular entry.
Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03946072.
Keywords: arrhythmias, cardiac; brain injuries; catheter ablation; electrophysiologic techniques, cardiac; embolism; follow-up studies; magnetic resonance imaging.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr Tung has received speaking honoraria from Abbott, Medtronic, Biotronik, Biosense Webster, and Boston Scientific. Dr Tzou has received consulting fees, speaker honoraria, or grant funding or served on advisory board for Abbott, Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Kardium, and Medtronic. Dr Cooper reports serving as a consultant/advisory board member for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Volta Medical, and receiving honoraria for Fellow Education Lectures from Abbott Medical. Dr Nazer is a consultant to Siemens, Biosense Webster, and Boston Scientific and receives research support from Siemens. Dr Chelu reports grants from PCORI, grants and personal fees from Abbott, grants and personal fees from Impulse Dynamics, and personal fees from Biosense Webster. Dr Hsu reports receiving honoraria from Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Sanofi, Altathera Pharmaceuticals, Milestone Pharmaceutical, Zoll Medical, iRhythm, Acutus Medical, Viz.ai, and Biosense Webster, and equity interest in Vektor Medical. The other authors report no conflicts.
Comment in
-
Assessing the Consequences of Retrograde and Transseptal Approaches to Ventricular Arrhythmia Ablation.Circulation. 2025 Apr 15;151(15):1060-1062. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.073626. Epub 2025 Apr 14. Circulation. 2025. PMID: 40228071 No abstract available.
References
-
- Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, Bryant WJ, Callans DJ, Curtis AB, Deal BJ, Dickfeld T, Field ME, Fonarow GC, Gillis AM, Hlatky MA, Granger CB, Hammill SC, Joglar JA, Kay GN, Matlock DD, Myerburg RJ, Page RL. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation 2017 - PubMed
-
- Hosseini SM, Rozen G, Saleh A, Vaid J, Biton Y, Moazzami K, Heist EK, Mansour MC, Kaadan MI, Vangel M, Ruskin JN. Catheter Ablation for Cardiac Arrhythmias: Utilization and In-Hospital Complications, 2000 to 2013. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2017;3:1240–1248 - PubMed
-
- Palaniswamy C, Kolte D, Harikrishnan P, Khera S, Aronow WS, Mujib M, Mellana WM, Eugenio P, Lessner S, Ferrick A, Fonarow GC, Ahmed A, Cooper HA, Frishman WH, Panza JA, Iwai S. Catheter ablation of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia: ten-year trends in utilization, in-hospital complications, and in-hospital mortality in the United States. Heart Rhythm 2014;11:2056–2063 - PubMed
-
- Gaita F, Caponi D, Pianelli M, Scaglione M, Toso E, Cesarani F, Boffano C, Gandini G, Valentini MC, De Ponti R, Halimi F, Leclercq JF. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a cause of silent thromboembolism? Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cerebral thromboembolism in patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2010;122:1667–1673 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources