Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;178(3):315-326.
doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-01347. Epub 2025 Feb 25.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk for Depression in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes : A Target Trial Emulation Study

Affiliations

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and Risk for Depression in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes : A Target Trial Emulation Study

Huilin Tang et al. Ann Intern Med. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown potential antidepressant effects, population studies yield inconsistent results.

Objective: To compare the risk for depression in older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating treatment with GLP-1RAs versus sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4is).

Design: Target trial emulation study.

Setting: U.S. National Medicare administrative data from January 2014 to December 2020.

Patients: Adults aged 66 years or older with T2D initiating treatment with a GLP-1RA were matched 1:1 on propensity score with those initiating treatment with either an SGLT2i or a DPP4i.

Measurements: The primary end point was incident depression. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI within matched groups.

Results: A total of 14 665 matched pairs of older adults were included in the cohort for GLP-1RAs versus SGLT2is; the rate difference of depression between GLP-1RA users and SGLT2i users was 3.48 (95% CI, -0.81 to 7.78) per 1000 person-years, with an HR of 1.07 (CI, 0.98 to 1.18). In the cohort for GLP-1RAs versus DPP4is (13 711 matched pairs), the rate difference was -5.78 (CI, -10.49 to -1.07) per 1000 person-years, with an HR of 0.90 (CI, 0.82 to 0.98).

Limitation: Unmeasured confounders (such as hemoglobin A1c levels and body mass index), outcome misclassification, and limited generalizability to all GLP-1RA users (for example, younger populations or those without T2D receiving the drug for obesity treatment).

Conclusion: Among older adults with T2D, the incidence of depression was relatively low. Use of GLP-1RAs was associated with a modestly lower risk for depression compared with use of DPP4is, but not SGLT2is.

Primary funding source: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Disclosure forms are available with the article online.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Study flow diagram. DPP4i = dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; GLP-1RA = glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; PS= propensity score; SGLT2i = sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor; T2D = type 2 diabetes. * Before 2016, we accessed a 5% random sample of Medicare; from 2016 onward, we assessed a 15% random sample that included the previous 5% sample.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier plots showing the cumulative incidence of depression in the 1:1 PS-matched cohorts for GLP-1RAs vs. SGLT2is (top) and GLP-1RAs vs. DPP4is (bottom). DPP4i = dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; GLP-1RA = glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; PS= propensity score; SGLT2i = sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Overall and subgroup analyses of the association between GLP-1RAs, compared with SGLT2is (top) or DPP4is (bottom), and risk for depression. DPP4i = dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; GLP-1RA = glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; HR = hazard ratio; IR = incidence rate; SGLT2i = sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor.

References

    1. Crawford AL, Laiteerapong N. Type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2024;177:ITC81–ITC96. doi: 10.7326/AITC202406180 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khan MAB, Hashim MJ, King JK, et al. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes – global burden of disease and forecasted trends. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020;10:107–111. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.191028.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report. 15 May 2024. Accessed at www.cdc.gov/diabetes/php/data-research/index.html on 7 June 2024.
    1. Farmaki P, Damaskos C, Garmpis N, et al. Complications of the type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2020;16:249–251. doi: 10.2174/1573403X1604201229115531 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dal Canto E, Ceriello A, Rydén L, et al. Diabetes as a cardiovascular risk factor: an overview of global trends of macro and micro vascular complications. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26:25–32. doi: 10.1177/2047487319878371 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances