Are There Differences Between Sexes in Performance-Related Variables During a Maximal Intermittent Flywheel Test?
- PMID: 39994496
- PMCID: PMC11851591
- DOI: 10.1177/19417381251320574
Are There Differences Between Sexes in Performance-Related Variables During a Maximal Intermittent Flywheel Test?
Abstract
Background: Isometric and dynamic tasks of low-to-moderate intensities have been used to study sex differences in fatigability; however, maximal exertions with flywheel devices (FDs) have not been used. This study aimed to (1) detect sex differences in fatigue-related performance in a maximal intermittent fatiguing protocol on a FD, and (2) investigate the most sensitive dynamometric and mechanical variables for assessing fatigue in both sexes.
Hypothesis: No sex differences should exist when performing this protocol on a FD.
Study design: Cohort observational study.
Level of evidence: Level 3.
Methods: A total of 34 young adults (17 female/17 male) performed 10 sets of 10 repetitions with 3 minutes of passive recovery of a half-squat exercise on a FD. Inter- and intraset analysis of force, power, velocity, work, and impulse, together with their relative change and slope, were calculated during concentric and eccentric phases. Raw data were also normalized to body mass in the interset analysis. The relative changes in each variable were compared.
Results: Men showed greater and earlier decreases in performance throughout sets (P < .05; ηp2 ≥ 0.08), but these differences were not consistent after normalization for body mass (P > .05; ηp2 ≤ 0.05). Irrespective of sex and phase, the intraset analysis revealed that relative change was higher in the last set (P ≤ .03; ηp2 ≥ 0.14), with power being the most sensitive variable for detecting performance decline (P ≤ .04; ηp2 = 0.49).
Conclusion: Women experienced slower and delayed fatigue kinetics than men during a maximal intermittent fatiguing protocol with FD if body dimensionality is not considered. For training purposes, power seems to be the most sensitive and discriminative variable for detecting decreases in performance.
Clinical relevance: Body dimensionality is a key factor that must be considered when comparing both sexes in FDs.
Keywords: eccentric; fatigability; inertial; squat; women.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no potential conflicts of interest in the development and publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Ansdell P, Škarabot J, Atkinson E, et al. Sex differences in fatigability following exercise normalised to the power-duration relationship. J Physiol. 2020;598(24):5717-5737. - PubMed
-
- Ansdell P, Thomas K, Hicks KM, Hunter SK, Howatson G, Goodall S. Physiological sex differences affect the integrative response to exercise: acute and chronic implications. Exp Physiol. 2020;105(12):2007-2021. - PubMed
-
- Ansdell P, Thomas K, Howatson G, Hunter S, Goodall S. Contraction intensity and sex differences in knee-extensor fatigability. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017;37:68-74. - PubMed
-
- Askling C, Karlsson J, Thorstensson A. Hamstring injury occurrence in elite soccer players after preseason strength training with eccentric overload. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2003;13(4):244-250. - PubMed
-
- Azevedo RdA, Forot J, Iannetta D, MacInnis MJ, Millet GY, Murias JM. Slight power output manipulations around the maximal lactate steady state have a similar impact on fatigue in females and males. J Appl Physiol. 2021;130(6):1879-1892. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
