Radical Prostatectomy in Multimodal Setting: Current Role of Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Hormonal or Chemotherapy-Based Treatments

Abstract

The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant hormonal or chemotherapy-based treatments before or after radical prostatectomy in localized or locally advanced high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is currently debatable. European guidelines recommend adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) only in pN1 patients after extended pelvic lymph node dissection based on outdated evidence on standard hormonal agents. The introduction of new-generation androgen receptor targeting agents (ARTAs) has revolutionized the treatment of metastatic PCa and might also impact the perioperative management of patients with high-risk localized disease. In the last years, a renewed interest has also arisen in chemotherapy-based neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments alone or in combination with ADT and/or ARTAs. In the present review, we gathered the current evidence on the oncological outcomes of neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic treatments in surgically treated patients with localized or locally advanced PCa. Despite mild benefits in terms of pathologic responses or oncological outcomes reported in some studies investigating ADT and/or chemotherapy in this setting of patients, strong evidence to support their use in clinical practice is lacking. Promising data in favor of ARTAs have been gathered from phase II trials and prospective series, but definitive results from phase III trials are awaited to confirm these findings.

Keywords: ADT; ARSI; adjuvant; docetaxel; high risk; hormonal therapy; neoadjuvant; prostate cancer; prostatectomy.