Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 5;15(2):87.
doi: 10.3390/bios15020087.

Differential Measurement of Involuntary Breathing Movements

Affiliations

Differential Measurement of Involuntary Breathing Movements

Jacob Seman et al. Biosensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Free divers are known to experience a physiological response during extreme breath holding, causing involuntary breathing movements (IBMs). To investigate these movements, a low-cost multi-core ESP32-Pico microcontroller prototype was developed to measure IBMs during a static breath hold. This novel device, called the bioSense, uses a differential measurement between two accelerometers placed on the sternum and the xiphoid process to acquire breathing-related movements. Sensor placement allowed for data acquisition that was posture- and body-shape-agnostic. Sensor placement was also designed to be as non-intrusive as possible and precisely capture breathing movements at configurable sampling rates. Measurements from the device were sent over WiFi to be accessed on a password-protected webserver and backed up to a micro-secure digital (microSD) card. This device was used in a pilot study, where it captured the various phases of breathing experienced by recreational free divers alongside a force plate measurement system for comparison.

Keywords: accelerometer; breathing movements; differential measurements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Typical IBM amplitude plot with physiological breaking point indicated (red).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Hardware overview of the bioSense device for involuntary breathing movement measurement is shown depicting the hardware placed on the printed circuit board (cyan), peripheral sensors placed on the subject’s body (blue), and remote interfaces (pink).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Printed circuit board design layout.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Block diagram illustrating the division of tasks performed by each of the ESP32 cores, with functions grouped by color to denote data storage (cyan), peripheral sensors (blue), and remote interfaces (pink).
Figure 5
Figure 5
The bioSense device can be placed on the body as shown in (a) with the accelerometers placed approximately on the xiphoid process and tip of the sternum. The belt containing the ESP 32 and battery should be worn in a comfortable position, such as around the hip. The %SpO2 sensor should be placed on the index or middle finger as shown in (b) and can be secured with medical tape.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Device current draw while performing each possible functionality action over time.
Figure 7
Figure 7
BioSense device differential acceleration measurements as compared to force plate measurements for a healthy human volunteer performing an extended breath hold. Vertical red lines are used to mark the start of the easy phase and struggle phase.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Normalized data from pilot study test subject during an extended breath hold. Data were truncated to remove recorded postural adjustments occurring prior to the start of the breath hold.
Figure 9
Figure 9
(a) The FFT identifies a peak at 2.090 Hz. (b) The FFT identifies peaks at 0.677 Hz, 1.285 Hz, and 2.137 Hz.
Figure 10
Figure 10
The (a) filtered signal and (b) FFT after applying a 5th-order digital Butterworth bandpass filter (corners at 0.5 Hz and 3.5 Hz). Frequencies identified in the FFT are 0.676 Hz, 1.284 Hz, and 2.133 Hz.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Signal analysis for (a) trend in frequency component magnitude and (b) time-dependent frequency, or a spectrogram.

References

    1. Parkka J., Ermes M., Korpipaa P., Mantyjarvi J., Peltola J., Korhonen I. Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2006;10:119–128. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2005.856863. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hussain F., Goncalves N.J., Alexandre D., Coelho P.J., Albuquerque C., Quietinho Leithardt V.R., Pires I.M. A smartphone accelerometer data-driven approach to recognize activities of daily life: A comparative study. Smart Health. 2023;30:100432. doi: 10.1016/j.smhl.2023.100432. - DOI
    1. Zhuo S., Sherlock L., Dobbie G., Koh Y.S., Russello G., Lottridge D. Real-time Smartphone Activity Classification Using Inertial Sensors—Recognition of Scrolling, Typing, and Watching Videos While Sitting or Walking. Sensors. 2020;20:655. doi: 10.3390/s20030655. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kamio C., Aihara T., Minorikawa G. Development of human movement measurement device for long-term measurements. Measurement. 2020;157:107671. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107671. - DOI
    1. Liu G.Z., Guo Y.W., Zhu Q.S., Huang B.Y., Wang L. Estimation of Respiration Rate from Three-Dimensional Acceleration Data Based on Body Sensor Network. Telemed. e-Health. 2011;17:705–711. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources