Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 14;15(2):69.
doi: 10.3390/jpm15020069.

Attitudes of Neurologists Toward Serum Neurofilament Light-Chain Testing in the Management of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis with Cognitive Impairment

Affiliations

Attitudes of Neurologists Toward Serum Neurofilament Light-Chain Testing in the Management of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis with Cognitive Impairment

José M García-Domínguez et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment has an impact upon the function and quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). High-serum neurofilament light-chain (sNfL) levels predict disease progression and are also associated with impaired cognitive performance. This study aimed to assess the attitudes of neurologists toward sNfL testing as regards making therapeutic decisions in clinically and radiologically stable patients experiencing cognitive decline. Methods: A web-based observational study was conducted among neurologists caring for patients with MS. The role of sNfL in therapeutic decisions was assessed through a simulated case scenario describing a 31-year-old woman with relapsing-remitting MS for four years on glatiramer acetate. Her partner reported increased distractibility and difficulties in organizing daily activities over the past 18 months. There was no history of new relapses, and a follow-up brain MRI scan showed no new lesions. Her performance in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test decreased by 8 points from the previous year, with 46 correct answers. The patient had an sNfL level of 21 pg/mL, with no other identified factors that could have altered this value. The participants were tasked with deciding to either escalate treatment or to continue the current treatment and schedule the patient for reassessment in 6-12 months (defined as decisions misaligned with emerging evidence [DMEE]). Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to determine factors associated with DMEE. Results: One hundred and sixteen neurologists participated in the study. Almost 50% of the participants (n = 57) opted not to escalate treatment despite high sNfL levels. This was more common among neurologists not fully dedicated to MS care (60.5% vs. 43.6%). The multivariate analysis showed that being a neurologist not fully dedicated to MS (odds ratio [OR] = 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-5.50; p = 0.04) and having a poor perception of sNfL benefits (OR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04; p = 0.01) were associated with DMEE. Conclusions: Neurologists' lack of full dedication to MS care and limited perception of sNfL's clinical utility were key factors associated with suboptimal therapeutic decisions in a simulated case of cognitive decline with elevated sNfL. These findings underscore the need for increased education on the role of sNfL to improve evidence-based decision-making in MS management.

Keywords: cognition; decision-making; multiple sclerosis; neurofilament light chain; personalized medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.M.G.-D. has received honoraria as a speaker, advisor, and researcher from Almirall, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva, and Sanofi. G.S. has provided consultancy services for Roche Farma Spain and is a recipient of the University of Toronto Scientific Merit Award. J.E.M.-L. has been compensated for roles as a consultant, chairman, and lecturer in various meetings and has participated in clinical trials and research projects supported by Alexion, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi. E.M. has received research grants, travel support, and honoraria for speaking engagements from Almirall, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, Janssen, and Novartis. L.L. has earned honoraria for participating in advisory boards and contributing to scientific and educational activities with Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Merck, Novartis, UCB, Roche, and Teva. V.M.-L. has received consulting and speaking fees from Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Terumo, Sanofi, Teva, and Bristol Myers Squibb. L.Q. has been compensated for speaking engagements by Merck, Sanofi, Roche, Biogen, Grifols, and CSL Behring; provided expert testimony for Grifols, Johnson & Johnson, Annexon Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi, Novartis, Takeda, and CSL Behring; and received research funding from Roche, UCB, and Grifols. E.A. has received honoraria for speaking engagements from Roche, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, and Biogen. The institution where S.M-Y. works has received in the last 3 years and destined exclusively to support the research of the Unit, fees for advisory council, collaborations, donations, and advice from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genzyme, Horizon/Amgen, Janssen, Kern Pharma, Lilly, Merck, Neuraxpharm, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, and Sanofi. S.M.-Y. has received support for attendance at congress in the last 3 years from Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sandoz. L.M.V. has received research grants and personal fees from Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, Biogen, and Novartis. A.B.C. has received compensation for her roles as a speaker, meeting moderator, and symposium organizer from Alter, Almirall, Bayer, Bial, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, and UCB, as well as support to attend scientific meetings from Biogen, Bial, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Teva. R.G.-B., E.G.-A., N.M., and J.M. are employees of Roche Farma Spain. Data were partially presented as an e-poster (P1532) at the 40th Congress of the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS), held from 18 to 20 September 2024, in Copenhagen, Denmark.

Similar articles

References

    1. Jakimovski D., Bittner S., Zivadinov R., Morrow S.A., Benedict R.H., Zipp F., Weinstock-Guttman B. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2024;403:183–202. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01473-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benedict R.H.B., Amato M.P., DeLuca J., Geurts J.J.G. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: Clinical management, MRI, and therapeutic avenues. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:860–871. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30277-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Meo E., Portaccio E., Bonacchi R., Giovannoli J., Niccolai C., Amato M.P. An update on the treatment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis. Expert. Rev. Neurother. 2025 doi: 10.1080/14737175.2025.2450788. epub ahead of print . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jellinger K.A. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: From phenomenology to neurobiological mechanisms. J. Neural Transm. 2024;131:871–899. doi: 10.1007/s00702-024-02786-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amato M.P., Prestipino E., Bellinvia A., Niccolai C., Razzolini L., Pastò L., Fratangelo R., Tudisco L., Fonderico M., Mattiolo P.L., et al. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: An exploratory analysis of environmental and lifestyle risk factors. PLoS. ONE. 2019;14:e0222929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222929. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources