Development and Validation of a Preoperative Prediction Model for Neoplastic Gallbladder Polyps
- PMID: 39998148
- DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2024.0800
Development and Validation of a Preoperative Prediction Model for Neoplastic Gallbladder Polyps
Abstract
Aims/Background The primary goal in evaluating gallbladder polypoid lesions (GPLs) is to identify neoplastic polyps (NP). Numerous studies have investigated risk factors for NP. This study aimed to develop a practical preoperative prediction model for NP using simple and easily accessible clinical variables. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from patients with GPLs who underwent cholecystectomy at Lanzhou University Second Hospital between January 2018 and September 2022. A total of 621 cases were included and randomly assigned into a training set (70%) and an internal validation set (30%). An external validation set was established using data from 117 patients treated at other centers between January and December 2023. Univariate logistic analyses were performed, followed by backward stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis for variables with p< 0.2 to identify significant variables associated with NP. These predictors were included in the final logistic regression model and visualized as a nomogram model. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility of the model were evaluated. Results Age (odd ratio (OR) = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03-1.09, p= 0.0001), polyp size (OR = 19.01, 95% CI = 6.48-55.79, p < 0.0001), polyp number (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.12-0.56, p = 0.0006), gallbladder wall thickness (OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.02-2.41, p= 0.0385), and polyp echo characteristics (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.19-0.85, p = 0.0169) were identified as independent influencing factors for NP. The area under the curve (AUC) of the nomogram model in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets were 0.886 (95% CI, 0.841-0.930), 0.836 (95% CI, 0.753-0.919), and 0.867 (95% CI, 0.743-0.978), respectively. Calibration curves for the three datasets showed Brier scores of 0.079, 0.092, and 0.070, all below 0.25, indicating good calibration. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC) analysis suggested that a threshold probability of 0.6 provided the most significant clinical benefit. Conclusion This prediction model, incorporating easily accessible variables, demonstrated excellent performance in the identification of NP and contributed to clinical decision-making in GPL management.
Keywords: clinical decision-making; gallbladder neoplasms; neoplastic polyps; nomogram; prediction model.
Similar articles
-
Development and validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting gallbladder adenoma.Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1749-1760. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11480-9. Epub 2025 Jan 14. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 39808305
-
Establishing a preoperative predictive model for gallbladder adenoma and cholesterol polyps based on machine learning: a multicentre retrospective study.World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan 28;23(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03671-y. World J Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39875897 Free PMC article.
-
[Establishment and Validation of a Predictive Model for Gallstone Disease in the General Population: A Multicenter Study].Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 May 20;55(3):641-652. doi: 10.12182/20240560501. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024. PMID: 38948266 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Risk Stratification for Postoperative Infection Following Laparoscopic-to-Open Cholecystectomy Conversion: Construction and Evaluation of a Clinical Prediction Model.Ann Ital Chir. 2025;96(6):742-749. doi: 10.62713/aic.4073. Ann Ital Chir. 2025. PMID: 40519025
-
Gallbladder polypoid lesions: Current practices and future prospects.Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Jul 20;137(14):1674-1683. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003019. Epub 2024 Feb 29. Chin Med J (Engl). 2024. PMID: 38420780 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous