Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 25;14(1):220-245.
doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00005. Print 2025 Mar 28.

The International Work Addiction Scale (IWAS): A screening tool for clinical and organizational applications validated in 85 cultures from six continents

Edyta Charzyńska  1 Aleksandra Buźniak  2 Stanisław K Czerwiński  2 Natalia Woropay-Hordziejewicz  2 Zuzanna Schneider  3 Toivo Aavik  4 Mladen Adamowic  5 Byron G Adams  6   7   8 Sami M Al-Mahjoob  9 Saad A S Almoshawah  10 Jim Arrowsmith  11 Stephen Asatsa  12 Stéphanie Austin  13 Shahnaz Aziz  14 Arnold B Bakker  15   16 Cristian Balducci  17 Eduardo Barros  18 Sergiu Bălțătescu  19 Dana Bdier  20   21 Nitesh Bhatia  22 Snezana Bilic  23 Diana Boer  24 Avner Caspi  25 Trawin Chaleeraktrakoon  26 Connie I M Chan  27 Chung-Jen Chien  28 Hoon-Seok Choi  29 Rajneesh Choubisa  30 Marilyn Clark  31 ĐorĐe Čekrlija  32   33 Zsolt Demetrovics  34   35   36 Eglantina Dervishi  37 Piyanjali de Zoysa  38 Alejandra Del Carmen Domínguez Espinosa  39 Sonya Dragova-Koleva  40 Vasiliki Efstathiou  41 Maria Eugenia Fernandez  42   43 Claude Fernet  13 Hesham F Gadelrab  44   45 Vladimer Gamsakhurdia  46 Ragna Benedikta Garðarsdóttir  47 Luis Eduardo Garrido  48 Nicolas Gillet  49   50 Sónia P Gonçalves  51   52 Mark D Griffiths  53 Naira Rafik Hakobyan  54 Fatimah Wati Halim  55 Michel Hansenne  56 Bashar Banwan Hasan  57 Mari Herttalampi  58 Clifford K Hlatywayo  59 Ivana Hromatko  60 Eric Raymond Igou  61 Dzintra Iliško  62 Ulker Isayeva  63 Hussein Nabil Ismail  64 Dorthe Høj Jensen  65 Paul Kakupa  66 Shanmukh Kamble  67 Ahmed Kerriche  68 Bettina Kubicek  69 Nuworza Kugbey  70 Bernadette Kun  34 J Hannah Lee  71 Elena Lisá  72 Yanina Lisun  73 María Laura Lupano Perugini  74   75   76 Francesco Marcatto  77 Biljana Maslovarić  78 Koorosh Massoudi  79 Tracy A McFarlane  80 Samson John Mgaiwa  81 Seyyed Taha Moosavi Jahanabad  82 Rodrigo Moreta-Herrera  83 Hang Thi Minh Nguyen  84 Yohsuke Ohtsubo  85 Tuğba Özsoy  86 Kjell Ivar Øvergård  87 Ståle Pallesen  88 Jane Parker  11 Nejc Plohl  89 Halley M Pontes  90 Rachael Potter  91 Alan Roe  92 Adil Samekin  93 Marion K Schulmeyer  94 Telman Z Seisembekov  95 María José Serrano-Fernández  96 Ghada Shahrour  97 Jelena Sladojević Matić  98 Rosita Sobhie  99 Paola Spagnoli  100 Joana Story  101 Mark J M Sullman  102   103 Liliya Sultanova  104 Ruimei Sun  105   106 Angela Oktavia Suryani  107 Steve Sussman  108 Mendiola Teng-Calleja  109 Julio Torales  110   111 Germano Vera Cruz  112 Anise M S Wu  105   106 Xue Yang  113 Katerina Zabrodska  114   115 Arunas Ziedelis  116 Paweł A Atroszko  2
Affiliations

The International Work Addiction Scale (IWAS): A screening tool for clinical and organizational applications validated in 85 cultures from six continents

Edyta Charzyńska et al. J Behav Addict. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Despite the last decade's significant development in the scientific study of work addiction/workaholism, this area of research is still facing a fundamental challenge, namely the need for a valid and reliable measurement tool that shows cross-cultural invariance and, as such, allows for worldwide studies on this phenomenon.

Methods: An initial 16-item questionnaire, developed within an addiction framework, was administered alongside job stress, job satisfaction, and self-esteem measures in a total sample of 31,352 employees from six continents and 85 cultures (63.5% females, mean age of 39.24 years).

Results: Based on theoretical premises and psychometric testing, the International Work Addiction Scale (IWAS) was developed as a short measure representing essential features of work addiction. The seven-item version (IWAS-7), covering all seven components of work addiction, showed partial scalar invariance across 81 cultures, while the five-item version (IWAS-5) showed it across all 85 cultures. Higher levels of work addiction on both versions were associated with higher job stress, lower job satisfaction, and lower self-esteem across cultures. The optimal cut-offs for the IWAS-7 (24 points) and IWAS-5 (18 points) were established with an overall accuracy of 96% for both versions.

Discussion and conclusions: The IWAS is a valid, reliable, and short screening scale that can be used in different cultures and languages, providing comparative and generalizable results. The scale can be used globally in clinical and organizational settings, with the IWAS-5 being recommended for most practical and clinical situations. This is the first study to provide data supporting the hypothesis that work addiction is a universal phenomenon worldwide.

Keywords: Bergen Work Addiction Scale; compulsive overworking; cross-cultural; validation study; work addiction; workaholism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: ZD is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Behavioral Addictions. AMSW, BKun, MDG, and SP are members of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Behavioral Addictions. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
LPA of the IWAS-7 (Fig. 1a) and IWAS-5 (Fig. 1b) Items Note. For the IWAS-7, the consecutive items assess the following components of work addiction: salience, tolerance, mood modification, relapse, withdrawal, conflict, and problems. For the IWAS-5, the consecutive items assess salience, mood modification, relapse, conflict, and problems.

References

    1. Acosta-Prado, J. C., Tafur-Mendoza, A. A., Zárate-Torres, R. A., & Ramírez-Ospina, D. E. (2021). Psychometric properties of heavy work investment measures: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(22), 12539. 10.3390/su132212539. - DOI
    1. Alberg, A. J., Park, J. W., Hager, B. W., Brock, M. V., & Diener‐West, M. (2004). The use of “overall accuracy” to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(5 Pt 1), 460–465. 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30091.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen, F. B., Djugum, M. E. T., Sjåstad, V., & Pallesen, S. (2023). The prevalence of workaholism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1252373. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1252373. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreassen, C. S. (2014). Workaholism: An overview and current status of the research. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(1), 1–11. 10.1556/JBA.2.2013.017. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Hetland, J., & Pallesen, S. (2012). Development of a work addiction scale. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(3), 265–272. 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00947.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types