Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 12;73(10):6124-6134.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c12842. Epub 2025 Feb 25.

Activating the d-Tagatose Production Capacity of Escherichia coli with Structural Insights into C4 Epimerase Specificity

Affiliations

Activating the d-Tagatose Production Capacity of Escherichia coli with Structural Insights into C4 Epimerase Specificity

Dileep Sai Kumar Palur et al. J Agric Food Chem. .

Abstract

d-Tagatose, a rare low-calorie sweetener, is ideal for beverages due to its high solubility and low viscosity. Current enzymatic production methods from d-galactose or d-galactitol are limited by reaction reversibility, affecting the yield and purity. This study demonstrates that Escherichia coli harbors a thermodynamically favorable pathway for producing d-tagatose from d-glucose via phosphorylation-epimerization-dephosphorylation steps. GatZ and KbaZ, annotated as aldolase chaperones, exhibit C4 epimerization activity, converting d-fructose-6-phosphate to d-tagatose-6-phosphate. Structural analysis reveals active site differences between these enzymes and class II aldolases, indicating functional divergence. By exploiting the strains' inability to metabolize d-tagatose, carbon starvation was applied to remove sugar byproducts. The engineered strains converted 45 g L-1 d-glucose to d-tagatose, achieving a titer of 7.3 g L-1 and a productivity of 0.1 g L-1 h-1 under test tube conditions. This approach highlights E. coli as a promising host for efficient d-tagatose production.

Keywords: d-tagatose; metabolic engineering; rare sugars.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): The authors declare the following financial interests which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dileep Sai Kumar Palur, Jayce E. Taylor, Bryant Luu, Augustine Arredondo, Ian C. Anderson, Trevor Gannalo, Justin B. Siegel, and Shota Atsumi are inventors on the patent application related to this study. John Didzbalis is employed by Mars, Incorporated, a manufacturer of food and confectionery.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Strategies for the biosynthesis of d-tagatose. a) “Izumoring strategies” for d-tagatose production. b) Phosphorylation/dephosphorylation strategy for d-tagatose. c) The proposed biosynthetic production of d-tagatose in E. coli. Deleted steps are in blue. Additionally expressed steps are in red. PTS, the phosphotransferase system; GatZ, putative tagatose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase 2 chaperone; KbaZ, putative tagatose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase 1 chaperone; HxpA, hexitol phosphatase A; Zwf, NADP+-dependent glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; Pgm, phosphoglucomutase; PfkA, 6-phosphofructokinase 1; PfkB, 6-phosphofructokinase 2; AlsE, d-allulose-6-phosphate 3-epimerase; ManA, mannose-6-phosphate isomerase; GatY, tagatose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase 2; KbaY, tagatose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase 1.
Figure 2
Figure 2
d-tagatose production capability ofE. coli. Cells were grown in M9P media with 10 g L–1 glucose at 37 °C to OD600 ∼ 0.4, then grown at 30 °C for 24 h. At OD600 ∼ 0.4, 1 mM IPTG was added (c, d). a) d-tagatose production in AL1050 (MG1655 + lacIqtetR specR), AL3755 (AL1050 with ΔpfkA), and AL4240 (AL1050 with ΔpfkA Δzwf) (Table 1). b) Effect of each epimerase gene deletion on d-tagatose production in AL4240. c) d-tagatose production in AL4424 (AL1050 with ΔpfkA Δzwf ΔgatZ) with and without additional expression of gatZ. (Table 1 and 2). d) Effect of additional expression of each phosphatase gene and gatZ on d-tagatose production in AL4424 (AL1050 with ΔpfkA Δzwf ΔgatZ). Error bars indicate s.d. (n = 3 biological replicates).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Modulating expression of genes for d-tagatose production. Cells were grown in M9P media with 10 g L–1 glucose at 37 °C to OD600 ∼ 0.4, then grown at 30 °C for 24 h. At OD600 ∼ 0.4, 1 mM IPTG was added when required. a) Each candidate epimerase gene was expressed along with hxpA under PLlacO1 promoter (Table 2) in AL4424 (AL1050 with ΔpfkA Δzwf ΔgatZ, Table 1). b) Either gatZ or kbaZ and hxpA were expressed under PLlacO1 or PgadB. The start codon of hxpA was changed from GTG to ATG (hxpA*). Errors indicate s.d. (n = 3 biological replicates).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Structure analysis of GatZ. a) Predicted substrate-binding mode of the AlphaFold structure of GatZ with F6P. b) Substrate-binding model of FBA (PDB: 3GAY) with d-tagatose-1,6-diphosphate. Zn2+ ions are shown as gray spheres in the structural models in (a) and (b). c) Reaction mechanism of FBA catalyzing the conversion of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate to dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (G3P). d) Reaction mechanism of GatZ catalyzing the conversion of F6P to T6P.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The effect of gene deletions on d-tagatose production. Cells were grown in M9P media with 10 g L–1 glucose to OD600 ∼ 0.4 at 37 °C, then grown at 30 °C for 24 h. Errors indicate s.d. (n = 3 biological replicates).
Figure 6
Figure 6
High cell density d-tagatose production. Cultures were grown in M9P media with 40 g L–1 (a–c) and 15 g L–1 (d–f) glucose concentration at 37 °C until an OD600 of ∼0.4–0.6. Induced with 1 mM IPTG if necessary and grown for a further 30 min. Cultures were then spun down and resuspended in M9P media with 40 g L–1 (a–c) and 15 g L–1 (d–f) glucose, induced with 1 mM IPTG if necessary, to an OD600 of ∼10 and grown at 30 °C. Each day M9P media with 40 g L–1 (a–c) and 15 g L–1 (d–f) glucose was added to the production media. (a and d) d-tagatose production, (b and e) d-fructose production, and (c and f) d-mannitol production. Error bars indicate s.d. (n = 3 biological replicates).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alsubhi M.; Blake M.; Nguyen T.; Majmudar I.; Moodie M.; Ananthapavan J. Consumer Willingness to Pay for Healthier Food Products: A Systematic Review. Obes Rev. 2023, 24 (1), e1352510.1111/obr.13525. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blüher M. Obesity: Global Epidemiology and Pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15 (5), 288–298. 10.1038/s41574-019-0176-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lustig R. H.; Schmidt L. A.; Brindis C. D. The Toxic Truth about Sugar. Nature 2012, 482 (7383), 27–29. 10.1038/482027a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prinz P. The Role of Dietary Sugars in Health: Molecular Composition or Just Calories?. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 73 (9), 1216–1223. 10.1038/s41430-019-0407-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sugar Substitutes Market Size, Share, Forecast [Latest]. MarketsandMarkets, https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/sugar-substitute-market.... (accessed 21 Novermber 2024).

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources