Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;104(3):1735-1745.
doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06262-9. Epub 2025 Feb 26.

Is there still a place for autologous salvage transplantation in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies?

Affiliations

Is there still a place for autologous salvage transplantation in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapies?

Simone Karp et al. Ann Hematol. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

For patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after previous autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT), novel agents, cellular and immunotherapies are increasingly available. Options for second-line treatment mostly include triplet regimens based on proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies and since recently also CAR T cells. The importance of autologous salvage transplantation (retransplantation, Re-AHCT) has significantly decreased in recent years due to the availability of many new treatment options. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis of 171 pts cases with RRMM who received Re-AHCT between 2002 and 2021. With a median follow-up of 74.7 months, the 5-year rates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18% (median 20.6 months) and 57% (median 65.0 months), respectively, the 100-day mortality rate was 4%. Multivariate analysis identified R-ISS stage and duration of previous response (DoR) as independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. While the revealed high-risk population (R-ISS stage II/III, DoR ≤ 24 months) was associated with a significantly worse PFS (HR 2.728) and OS (HR 3.129), the low-risk group (R-ISS I, DoR > 24 months) achieved a median PFS and OS of 45.0 months and 80.2 months, respectively. Therefore, Re-AHCT could remain an option in such prognostically favorable pts with RRMM even in the era of novel therapies especially when more potent treatment modalities are not available.

Keywords: Autologous hematopoetic cell transplantation; Multiple myeloma; Relapse; Retransplantation; Salvage autologous.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the regional ethics committees of the State Chamber of Physicians of Saxony (EK-BR-40/23 − 1). Patient consent: Patient consent was waived in accordance with the ethical approval due to retrospective design of the analysis and anonymization. Competing interests: K. Trautmann-Grill has received consultation fees and/or honoraria from Sanofi, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen, GSK, Janssen; travel grants from Janssen, NovoNordisk, GSK, Sanofi and has participated in Data Safety Monitoring Board or advisory boards for Sanofi, Novartis, Amgen, GSK. M. Hänel has received consultations fees and/or honoraria from Novartis, Amgen, GSK, Celgene, Sanofi-Aventis, Janssen, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. R. Herbst has received honoraria from Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Amgen. R. Teipel has participated in advisory boards or has received honoraria from Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, GSK, Gilead, Sanofi, Amgen, Stemline, Oncopeptides and Abbvie as well as research and travel grants from Janssen. All other authors declare no competing financial interests in relation to the work described. All authors declare that potential competing interests did not influence the content and results of the manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Progression-free survival (a) and overall survival (b) for 171 patient cases after Re-AHCT
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Progression-free survival (a) and overall survival (b) by risk groups. Low risk (LR), intermediate risk (IR) and high risk (HR) based on R-ISS and duration of response for 167 patient cases

Similar articles

References

    1. Dhakal B, Szabo A, Chhabra S, Hamadani M, D’Souza A, Usmani SZ et al (2018) Autologous transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of novel agent induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 4(3):343–350. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4600 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Engelhardt M, Terpos E, Kleber M, Gay F, Wäsch R, Morgan G et al (2014) European myeloma network recommendations on the evaluation and treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica 99(2):232–242. 10.3324/haematol.2013.099358 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gay F, Engelhardt M, Terpos E, Wäsch R, Giaccone L, Auner HW et al (2018) From transplant to novel cellular therapies in multiple myeloma: European Myeloma network guidelines and future perspectives. Haematologica 103(2):197–211. 10.3324/haematol.2017.174573 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garderet L, Cook G, Auner HW, Bruno B, Lokhorst H, Perez-Simon JA et al (2017) Treatment options for relapse after autograft in multiple myeloma – report from an EBMT educational meeting. Leuk Lymphoma 58(4):797–808. 10.1080/10428194.2016.1228926 - PubMed
    1. Dimopoulos M, Quach H, Mateos MV, Landgren O, Leleu X, Siegel D et al (2020) Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 396(10245):186–197. 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30734-0 - PubMed