Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr;25(4):523-540.
doi: 10.1007/s12012-025-09978-2. Epub 2025 Feb 25.

Role of the Transient Receptor Potential Ankyrin-1 in the Pulmonary, Vascular, and Systemic Effects of Short-Term Acrolein Inhalation in Mice: Implications for the Toxicity of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

Affiliations

Role of the Transient Receptor Potential Ankyrin-1 in the Pulmonary, Vascular, and Systemic Effects of Short-Term Acrolein Inhalation in Mice: Implications for the Toxicity of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

Lexiao Jin et al. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

The cardiovascular and pulmonary disease risks of the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are uncertain. We recently showed that ENDS solvent-derived aerosol (propylene glycol and vegetable glycerin, PG:VG) exposure induced a transient receptor potential ankyrin-1 (TRPA1)-dependent endothelial dysfunction (ED) in healthy female mice. As thermal degradation of PG:VG generates aldehydes, we hypothesized that acrolein (AC), a constituent of ENDS-derived aerosol and a known TRPA1 agonist, was responsible, in part, for the observed TRPA1-dependent pulmonary and vascular effects of PG:VG. To test this, female wild-type (WT) and TRPA1 null mice were exposed by inhalation to either filtered air or AC alone, and biomarkers of exposure and of harm were measured. Compared with their genotype-matched air control group, JUUL Virginia Tobacco (VT), PG:VG, and AC alone exposures (6 h) significantly increased urinary levels of the AC metabolite, 3-hydroxypropyl mercapturic acid (3HPMA), in both female WT and TRPA1 null mice. AC exposures at 1 and 3 ppm led to the rapid onset and reversal (upon cessation) of 'respiratory braking' in female WT but not in TRPA1 null mice indicating a TRPA1 dependence. As AC stimulated TRPA1-dependent respiratory braking, we measured urinary monoamines and their metabolites after exposure as a proxy of nervous system activation. In WT mice, AC exposure suppressed levels of dopamine, metanephrine, serotonin (5HT), and 5HT metabolite (5HIAA), whereas in TRPA1 null mice only 5HT was equally suppressed by AC. To assess vascular effects, mice were exposed for 4 days to Air or AC (6 h/day, 1 ppm), and aortic function was measured ex vivo. Although endothelial-dependent relaxation was similar in air control and AC-exposed mice, aortic sensitivity to an NO donor was enhanced significantly and equally by AC in both WT and TRPA1 null mice reflective of a TRPA1-independent and compensatory effect. Collectively, AC exposure at a level present in ENDS aerosols stimulated both TRPA1-dependent and -independent pulmonary, vascular, and systemic effects. These data suggest that ENDS use may increase cardiovascular and pulmonary disease risk, in part, via AC present in ENDS-derived aerosols yet independent of either nicotine or flavorants. The level of AC present in ENDS aerosols should be lowered to an amount where it does not induce biomarkers of vascular, pulmonary, and systemic harm to mitigate potential long-term disease risk.

Keywords: Aldehyde; ENDS; Endothelial dysfunction; Irritants; Respiratory braking; TRPA1; Tobacco.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration/Center for Tobacco Products, Department of Defense, or the American Heart Association.

References

    1. Berlowitz JB, Xie W, Harlow AF, Hamburg NM, Blaha MJ, Bhatnagar A, Benjamin EJ, & Stokes AC (2022). E-cigarette use and risk of cardiovascular disease: A longitudinal analysis of the PATH Study (2013–2019). Circulation, 145, 1557–1559. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057369 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nayeri A, & Middlekauff H (2021). Vaping instead of cigarette smoking: A panacea or just another form of cardiovascular risk? Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 37, 690–698. 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.12.008 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fetterman JL, Keith RJ, Palmisano JN, McGlasson KL, Weisbrod RM, Majid S, Bastin R, Stathos MM, Stokes AC, Robertson RM, et al. (2020). Alterations in vascular function associated with the use of combustible and electronic cigarettes. Journal of the American Heart Association, 9, e014570. 10.1161/JAHA.119.014570 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carnevale R, Sciarretta S, Violi F, Nocella C, Loffredo L, Perri L, Peruzzi M, Marullo AG, De Falco E, Chimenti I, et al. (2016). Acute impact of tobacco vs electronic cigarette smoking on oxidative stress and vascular function. Chest, 150, 606–612. 10.1016/j.chest.2016.04.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haptonstall KP, Choroomi Y, Moheimani R, Nguyen K, Tran E, Lakhani K, Ruedisueli I, Gornbein J, & Middlekauff HR (2020). Differential effects of tobacco cigarettes and electronic cigarettes on endothelial function in healthy young people. American Journal of Physiology. Heart and Circulatory Physiology, 319, H547–H556. 10.1152/ajpheart.00307.2020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources