Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Feb 25;15(1):6796.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89915-z.

Risk-benefits assessment of tamoxifen or raloxifene as chemoprevention for risk reduction of breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers: a meta-analysis

Ameen S S Alwashmi  1 , Najeeb Ullah Khan  2 , Tianhui Chen  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Risk-benefits assessment of tamoxifen or raloxifene as chemoprevention for risk reduction of breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers: a meta-analysis

Ameen S S Alwashmi et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a major global health burden, with hereditary factors such as BRCA1/2 mutations significantly increasing the lifetime risk. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the outcomes of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), tamoxifen, and raloxifene as chemopreventive agents for breast cancer risk reduction in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases were searched for relevant studies published between 2000 and 2024. Case-control studies and observational cohort studies examining the use of tamoxifen/raloxifene in BRCA1/2 carriers were included. Data on the incidence and risk ratios of breast cancer were also extracted. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.4.0).

Results: Nine studies (13,676 women) were included. Two studies had low risk, and the remaining seven studies had moderate risk, as assessed by the NOS checklist. Pooled analysis showed tamoxifen/raloxifene decreased breast cancer risk compared to controls (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.88, p = 0.04). The risk ratio of breast cancer incidence among BRCA1/2 carriers was reduced after tamoxifen use (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.48-2.23, p < 0.00001). Subgroup analysis revealed reduced breast cancer risk with SERM use in both BRCA1 (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.48-1.51) and BRCA2 carriers (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.40-1.58). The heterogeneity ranged from 51 to 85%, representing high significance and variation in true effect sizes underlying the different included studies. Whereas the heterogeneity among subgroups BRCA1 and BRCA2 was 98%, and the difference was 0%, showing no difference in response to SERM for risk reduction of breast cancer.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides evidence that tamoxifen and raloxifene significantly reduce the breast cancer risk in women with BRCA1/2 mutations. Chemoprevention efficacy was similar for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Further research is needed to validate these findings and to optimize their use in high-risk populations.

Keywords: BRCA1/2; Breast cancer; Chemoprevention; Raloxifene; Selective estrogen receptor modulators; Tamoxifen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screening and selection of included studies by PRISMA Guidelines.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of Risk ratio of breast cancer incidence among tamoxifen or raloxifene and control.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Funnel plot of Risk ratio of breast cancer incidence among tamoxifen or raloxifene and control.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of the risk ratio of breast cancer among BRCA1/2 carriers.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Funnel plot of the risk ratio of breast cancer among BRCA1/2 carriers.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot of the risk ratio of breast cancer incidence among BRCA1 and BRCA2 subgroups.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Funnel plot of the risk ratio of breast cancer among BRCA1 and BRCA2 risk ratio.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Collaborators, G. et al. The global burden of cancer attributable to risk factors, 2010–19: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet400 (10352), 563–591 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sung, H. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J. Clin.71 (3), 209–249 (2021). - PubMed
    1. Behl, T. et al. Understanding the mechanistic pathways and clinical aspects associated with protein and gene-based biomarkers in breast cancer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol.245, 126595 (2023). - PubMed
    1. Antunes Meireles, P. et al. Comparing prognosis for BRCA1, BRCA2, and Non-BRCA breast Cancer. Cancers15 (23), 5699 (2023). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pourmasoumi, P., Moradi, A. & Bayat, M. BRCA1/2 mutations and breast/ovarian cancer risk: A new insights review. Reprod. Sci. 1–11 (2024). - PubMed

Publication types