Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 9;15(2):169.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci15020169.

The Balance in the Head: How Developmental Factors Explain Relationships Between Brain Asymmetries and Mental Diseases

Affiliations
Review

The Balance in the Head: How Developmental Factors Explain Relationships Between Brain Asymmetries and Mental Diseases

Martina Manns et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

Cerebral lateralisation is a core organising principle of the brain that is characterised by a complex pattern of hemispheric specialisations and interhemispheric interactions. In various mental disorders, functional and/or structural hemispheric asymmetries are changed compared to healthy controls, and these alterations may contribute to the primary symptoms and cognitive impairments of a specific disorder. Since multiple genetic and epigenetic factors influence both the pathogenesis of mental illness and the development of brain asymmetries, it is likely that the neural developmental pathways overlap or are even causally intertwined, although the timing, magnitude, and direction of interactions may vary depending on the specific disorder. However, the underlying developmental steps and neuronal mechanisms are still unclear. In this review article, we briefly summarise what we know about structural, functional, and developmental relationships and outline hypothetical connections, which could be investigated in appropriate animal models. Altered cerebral asymmetries may causally contribute to the development of the structural and/or functional features of a disorder, as neural mechanisms that trigger neuropathogenesis are embedded in the asymmetrical organisation of the developing brain. Therefore, the occurrence and severity of impairments in neural processing and cognition probably cannot be understood independently of the development of the lateralised organisation of intra- and interhemispheric neuronal networks. Conversely, impaired cellular processes can also hinder favourable asymmetry development and lead to cognitive deficits in particular.

Keywords: cognitive impairment; gene environment; lateralisation; ontogeny; stress; translational/preclinical research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Potential effects of asymmetry formation on the pathogenesis of a mental disorder during the three main phases of neuronal development—each phase is dominated by different cellular processes that lead to an increasingly lateralised functional organisation of the two cerebral hemispheres [179]. As a consequence, factors and processes that regulate the pathogenesis of a disorder act in a lateralised manner.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Simplified scheme of four possible links between the development of hemispheric asymmetries (LATERALISATION) and the pathogenesis of a mental disorder (DISORDER), based on a model proposed by Bishop [211]. While genetic factors (GENES) determine the susceptibility to the development of a particular mental disorder on the one hand and to hemispheric asymmetries on the other, it is epigenetic factors (stars), which have a decisive influence on development during different ontogenetic phases and may play a linking role between developmental pathways. The different modes of genetic–epigenetic interactions determine the properties of synaptic transmission and plasticity, as well as the structural and functional organisation of neuronal networks, leading to adaptive or maladaptive functionality and COGNITIVE EFFECTS. Not all functional consequences are related between both traits; here is only indicated how a cognitive effect results from the developmental pathways described. The direction and extent of the relationships can vary depending on the neuronal subsystems or cognitive modules and developmental phases involved.

Similar articles

References

    1. Berker E.A., Berker A.H., Smith A. Translation of Broca’s 1865 Report. Localization of Speech in the Third Left Frontal Convolution. Arch. Neurol. 1986;43:1065–1072. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1986.00520100069017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Güntürkün O., Ströckens F., Ocklenburg S. Brain Lateralization: A Comparative Perspective. Physiol. Rev. 2020;100:1019–1063. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00006.2019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ocklenburg S., Güntürkün O. The Lateralized Brain: The Neuroscience and Evolution of Hemispheric Asymmetries. 2nd ed. Academic Press; New York, NY, USA: 2024.
    1. Vingerhoets G. Phenotypes in Hemispheric Functional Segregation? Perspectives and Challenges. Phys. Life Rev. 2019;30:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2019.06.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vallortigara G., Rogers L.J. Survival with an Asymmetrical Brain: Advantages and Disadvantages of Cerebral Lateralization. Behav. Brain Sci. 2005;28:575–589; discussion 589–633. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05000105. - DOI - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources