Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 9;14(4):1115.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14041115.

Assessment of Post-Operative Neurosensory Deficiency Following Le Fort I Maxillary Osteotomy and Its Impact on Patient Satisfaction: A Retrospective Clinical Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Assessment of Post-Operative Neurosensory Deficiency Following Le Fort I Maxillary Osteotomy and Its Impact on Patient Satisfaction: A Retrospective Clinical Cross-Sectional Study

Yasser S Alali et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy (LF1-MO) is associated with a risk of infraorbital nerve neurosensory deficiency (NSD). This study aimed to evaluate post-operative subjective numbness and objective NSD after LF1-MO and assess the impact of these outcomes on overall patient satisfaction. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among adult LF1-MO patients, who were evaluated for treatment satisfaction using a 10-item patient satisfaction questionnaire. In addition, subjective and objective NSDs were assessed post-operatively for six months. Overall patient satisfaction was compared against different variables (patient age, sex, and type of LF1-MO) and NSD. The proportion of subjective and objective NSDs were statistically correlated and compared against these variables, assuming a 95% significance level (p < 0.05). Results: A total of 58 LF1-MO patients in the age range of 20-38 years (mean-29.79 ± 4.62 years) were included in this study. Most patients were females (n = 48; 82.8%) and aged 30 years and older (n = 32; 55.2%). The overall mean patient satisfaction score was 27.38 ± 3.94 (range 12-30), which did not significantly differ based on patient age or sex. Patients who had advanced LF1-MO had significantly higher satisfaction scores (28.27 ± 1.85) compared to those who had impaction (24.61 ± 7.34) (p < 0.05). Subjective numbness and an abnormal "Level A" response to objective neurosensory testing were associated with poor patient satisfaction. There was significant statistical correlation between subjective and objective NSDs (Spearman's rho-0.441; p < 0.01). Based on a chi-squared test, patients undergoing maxillary setback (subjective-88.9%; objective-44.5%) had significantly higher NSDs (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Most patients reported satisfaction after LF1-MO, particularly among females, those aged 30 and older, and those without NSD. However, residual infraorbital NSDs persisted, with about two-thirds experiencing subjective numbness and 25% showing abnormal responses in "Level A" objective neurosensory tests six months post-operatively. Moreover, subjective numbness correlated with abnormal objective testing results, leading to lower patient satisfaction.

Keywords: Le Fort 1 osteotomy; maxillary osteotomy; neurosensory deficiency; orthognathic surgery; patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sensory and cutaneous innervation of the face by the maxillary and mandibular nerve and its branches. Black dotted transverse line in the maxillary bone indicate the representative Le Fort I osteotomy cut.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Objective testing for cutaneous neurosensory deficiency using the following stimuli: (a) pin-prick; (b) thermal (cold/heat); (c) static light-touch; (d) directional discrimination; and (e) two-point discrimination.

References

    1. Bendrihem R., Vacher C., Fohlen A., Pelage J.P. Anatomic basis of Le Fort 1 impaction osteotomy: A radiological study. Surgical and radiologic anatomy. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 2017;39:1209–1214. doi: 10.1007/s00276-017-1870-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bagheri S.C. Chapter 9—Orthognathic Surgery. In: Bagheri S.C., editor. Clinical Review of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2nd ed. Mosby; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2014. pp. 293–332. - DOI
    1. Smeets M., Da Costa Senior O., Eman S., Politis C. A retrospective analysis of the complication rate after SARPE in 111 cases, and its relationship to patient age at surgery. J. Cranio-Maxillofac. Surg. 2020;48:467–471. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.12.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manishaa V., Pendem S., Muthusekhar M.R., Pandurangan S.M. Evaluation of Postoperative Outcome and Incidence of Com-plications in Multisegment Le Fort I Osteotomies: A Case Series. Cureus. 2023;15:e39772. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39772. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. AlKharafi L., AlHajery D., Andersson L. Orthognathic surgery: Pretreatment information and patient satisfaction. Medical principles and practice. Int. J. Kuwait Univ. Health Sci. Cent. 2014;23:218–224. doi: 10.1159/000360735. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources