Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 14;14(4):1264.
doi: 10.3390/jcm14041264.

Influence of Mechanical Deformity on Joint Line Reconstruction

Affiliations

Influence of Mechanical Deformity on Joint Line Reconstruction

Anna Jungwirth-Weinberger et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background: Restoration of the joint line is important for an optimal outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The goal of this study was to analyze the accuracy of joint line reconstruction in conventionally performed TKA. The study evaluates the potential influences of mechanical deformity on joint line restoration. Methods: A total of 115 patients (58.3% female, mean age 72.4 years (52-89)) with 43 valgus and 72 varus knees were reviewed. A total of 36 patients underwent CR-TKA, and 79 underwent PS-TKA. The joint line was measured from the adductor tubercle to the joint line. Results: A total of 106 patients (92.2%) had the joint line restored within four millimeters. The distance increased significantly from preoperative (48.30 ± 6.35 mm) to postoperative 49.03 ± 6.29 mm (p = 0.003). Varus knees showed no significant change (p = 0.313), while valgus knees had a significant elevation (p = 0.0004). Conclusions: In conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the distance from the adductor tubercle to the joint line slightly increased. However, in most patients, the joint line was restored within four millimeters. Valgus knees in particular are at risk for postoperative joint line elevation.

Keywords: joint line restoration; joint line variability; total knee arthroplasty; valgus knee; varus knee.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The joint line position was measured on pre- and postoperative anterior–posterior radiographs using the adductor tubercle to joint line distance as previously reported by Hofmann et al. [1].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differences from pre- to postoperative adductor tubercle to joint line in varus and valgus knees (mm).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pre-postoperative adductor tubercle to joint line elevation in valgus knees.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The joint line from pre- to postoperative adductor tubercle remained stable in varus knees.

References

    1. Hofmann A.A., Kurtin S.M., Lyons S., Tanner A.M., Bolognesi M.P. Clinical and radiographic analysis of accurate restoration of the joint line in revision total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 2006;21:1154–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.10.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Lieshout W.A.M., Valkering K.P., Koenraadt K.L.M., van Etten-Jamaludin F.S., Kerkhoffs G., van Geenen R.C.I. The negative effect of joint line elevation after total knee arthroplasty on outcome. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2019;27:1477–1486. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5099-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bellemans J. Restoring the joint line in revision TKA: Does it matter? Knee. 2004;11:3–5. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0160(03)00099-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stiehl J.B., Abbott B.D. Morphology of the transepicondylar axis and its application in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J. Arthroplast. 1995;10:785–789. doi: 10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80075-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cross M.B., Nam D., Plaskos C., Sherman S.L., Lyman S., Pearle A.D., Mayman D.J. Recutting the distal femur to increase maximal knee extension during TKA causes coronal plane laxity in mid-flexion. Knee. 2012;19:875–879. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.05.007. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources