Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 13;17(4):676.
doi: 10.3390/nu17040676.

Efficacy of Fiber-Enriched Versus Fiber-Free Enteral Feeds on Bowel Function of Non-Critically Ill Tube-Fed Adult Patients in Saudi Arabia-A Prospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Efficacy of Fiber-Enriched Versus Fiber-Free Enteral Feeds on Bowel Function of Non-Critically Ill Tube-Fed Adult Patients in Saudi Arabia-A Prospective Cohort Study

Mostafa A Abolfotouh et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Background: There is controversy regarding whether using fiber-enriched formula affects the incidence of diarrhea among enterally fed patients in our setting. Also, there is a lack of clinical studies about enterally fed patients' tolerance for feeding and the incidence of diarrhea among patients in the Middle East. This study aimed to assess fiber enrichment's efficacy in reducing post-enteral feeding bowel intolerance in non-critically ill patients.

Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of 55 fiber-free (FF) and 119 fiber-enriched (FE) tube-fed adult patients admitted for five or more days with medical or surgical conditions. Data on patients' demographics, antibiotics and laxative medications, and gastrointestinal complications were collected. Absolute risk reduction (ARR), relative risk reduction (RRR), and relative risks (RR) were calculated to assess the efficacy of fiber enrichment in reducing post-enteral feeding bowel intolerance. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results: The rate of diarrhea dropped from 54.5% for FF to 29% for FE groups, with an ARR of 25.1% (95% CI 24.6-25.6, p < 0.001) and an RRR of 64.1%, and RR was 0.54, reflecting a reduction in the rate of diarrhea by 46% after fiber enrichment. The rate of significant weight loss dropped from 45.5% without enrichment to only 26.9% with enrichment, with an ARR of 18.6% (95% CI: 18.0-19.2, p < 0.001) and RRR of 40.9%, and RR was 0.59, reflecting a 41% reduction in significant weight loss after fiber enrichment. After adjusting for some potential confounders, FF formula was a significant predictor of diarrhea (OR = 3.04, 95% CI 1.49-6.19, p = 0.002) and significant weight loss (OR = 2.37, 95% CI 1.16-4.84, p = 0.018) in tube feeding, while antibiotic intake was also a significant predictor of only diarrhea (OR = 2.68, 95% CI 1.12-6.38, p = 0.026).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated the beneficial effect of fiber supplementation in minimizing diarrhea in hospitalized patients receiving tube feeding. Antibiotic usage must be scrutinized and stopped if possible. Overall, the study provides compelling evidence supporting fiber-enriched enteral feeding, though further discussion on potential confounders and clinical applications would enhance its impact. Further, well-designed RCTs are needed to prove the efficacy of fiber-enriched feeds used in enteral tube feeding in non-critically ill patients.

Keywords: Saudi Arabia; absolute risk reduction; bowel function; diarrhea; dietary fiber; enteral feeding; fiber supplementation; relative risk reduction; significant weight loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Incidence of bowel function complications in fiber-enriched and fiber-free groups of enteral feeding.

Similar articles

References

    1. Weimann A., Braga M., Harsanyi L., Laviano A., Ljungqvist O., Soeters P.D., Jauch K.W., Kemen M., Hiesmayr J.M., Horbach T., et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: Surgery including organ transplantation. Clin. Nutr. 2006;25:224–244. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.01.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pancorbo-Hidalgo P.L., García-Fernandez F.P., Ramírez-Pérez C. Complications associated with enteral nutrition by nasogastric tube in an internal medicine unit. J. Clin. Nurs. 2001;10:482–490. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00498.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luft V.C., Beghetto M.G., de Mello E.D., Polanczyk C.A. Role of enteral nutrition in the incidence of diarrhea among hospitalized adult patients. Nutrition. 2008;24:528–535. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2008.02.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Majid H.A., Sidek M.A., Chinna K. Psychometric properties of DAPonDEN: Definitions, attitudes and practices in relation to diarrhea during enteral nutrition questionnaire. Prev. Med. 2013;57:S64–S66. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.12.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lebak K.J., Bliss D.Z., Savik K., Patten-Marsh K.M. What’s new on defining diarrhea in tube-feeding studies? Clin. Nurs. Res. 2003;12:174–204. doi: 10.1177/1054773803012002005. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources