Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 19;18(2):275.
doi: 10.3390/ph18020275.

Design, Synthesis, and Antiproliferative Activity of Novel Indole/1,2,4-Triazole Hybrids as Tubulin Polymerization Inhibitors

Affiliations

Design, Synthesis, and Antiproliferative Activity of Novel Indole/1,2,4-Triazole Hybrids as Tubulin Polymerization Inhibitors

Esraa Mahmoud et al. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: New indole/1,2,4-triazole hybrids were synthesized and tested for antiproliferative activity against the NCI 60 cell line as tubulin polymerization inhibitors. Methods: All final compounds, 6a-j and 7a-j were evaluated at a single concentration of 10 µM against a panel of sixty cancer cell lines. Results: Compounds 7a-j, featuring the NO-releasing oxime moiety, exhibited superior anticancer activity to their precursor ketones 6a-j across all tested cancer cell lines. Compounds 6h, 7h, 7i, and 7j were chosen for five-dose evaluations against a comprehensive array of 60 human tumor cell lines. The data showed that all tested compounds had significant anticancer activity throughout the nine tumor subpanels studied, with selectivity ratios ranging from 0.52 to 2.29 at the GI50 level. Compounds 7h and 7j showed substantial anticancer effectiveness against most cell lines across nine subpanels, with GI50 values ranging from 1.85 to 5.76 µM and 2.45 to 5.23 µM. Compounds 6h, 7h, 7i, and 7j were assessed for their inhibitory effects on tubulin polymerization. Conclusions: The results showed that compound 7i, an oxime-based derivative, was the most effective at blocking tubulin, with an IC50 value of 3.03 ± 0.11 µM. This was compared to the standard drug CA-4, which had an IC50 value of 8.33 ± 0.29 µM. Additionally, cell cycle analysis and apoptosis assays were performed for compound 7i. Molecular computational investigations have been performed to examine the binding mode of the most effective compounds to the target enzyme.

Keywords: CA-4; NCI; anticancer; cancer; colchicine; tubulin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors state that they have no known competing financial interests or relationships that could have affected the work described in this study.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Synthesis of target compounds 6aj and 7aj.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Structure of CA-4 (I), isoCA-4 (II), and compounds III and IV.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structure of oxime-based binding tubulin compounds V and VI.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Structures of new targets 6aj and 7aj.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cell cycle analysis of 7i in MDA-MB 231 cell line.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Results for apoptosis induction assay of 7i.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Results for cell cycle analysis and apoptosis induction of 7i.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Ligplots at α/β-tubulin colchicine binding site: (A) 3D-docked model of CA-4 (dark yellow) showing the protein lipophilicity surface (purple: hydrophilic, white: neutral, and green: lipophilic), (cyan for α chain residues and brown for β chain residues), and (B) 2D-docked model of CA-4.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Ligplots at α/β-tubulin colchicine binding site: (A) a 3D-docked model of compound 7i (grey) showing the protein lipophilicity surface (purple: hydrophilic, white: neutral, and green: lipophilic), (cyan for α chain residues and brown for β chain residues), and (B) a 2D-docked model of 7i.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Ligplots at α/β-tubulin colchicine binding site: (A) 3D-docked model of compound 6h (dark yellow) showing the protein lipophilicity surface (purple: hydrophilic, white: neutral, and green: lipophilic), (cyan for α chain residues and brown for β chain residues), and (B) 2D-docked model of 6h.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ruddon R.W. Cancer Biology. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2007.
    1. Jiramongkol Y., Lam E.W.-F. Foxo transcription factor family in cancer and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2020;39:681–709. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mattiuzzi C., Lippi G. Current cancer epidemiology. J. Epidemiol. Glob. Health. 2019;9:217–222. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.191008.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nagai H., Kim Y.H. Cancer prevention from the perspective of global cancer burden patterns. J. Thorac. Dis. 2017;9:448. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.02.75. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019;69:7–34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources