Automated surveillance of hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia: feasibility and epidemiological results from a Dutch multicenter study
- PMID: 40007429
- PMCID: PMC12034453
- DOI: 10.1017/ice.2025.29
Automated surveillance of hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia: feasibility and epidemiological results from a Dutch multicenter study
Abstract
Objective: Hospital-onset bacteremia and fungemia (HOB) has been suggested as a suitable and automatable surveillance target to include in surveillance programs, however differences in definitions across studies limit interpretation and large-scale implementation. We aimed to apply an automated surveillance system for HOB in multiple hospitals using a consensus definition, and describe HOB rates.
Design and setting: Retrospective cohort study in four Dutch hospitals: 1 tertiary hospital and 3 secondary hospitals.
Patients: All patients admitted for at least one overnight stay between 2017 and 2021 were included, except patients in psychiatry wards.
Methods: Data from the electronic health records and laboratory information system were used to identify HOBs based on the PRAISE consensus definition. HOB rates were calculated at ward and micro-organism-level.
Results: Hospital-wide HOB rates varied from 1.0 to 1.9, and ICU rates varied from of 8.2 to 12.5 episodes per 1000 patient days. The median time between admission and HOB was 8-13 days. HOBs were predominantly caused by Enterobacterales, Enterococci, S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Longitudinal HOB surveillance detected differences over time at ward and micro-organism level; for example increased HOB rates were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated the impact of assumptions regarding the collection of confirmatory blood cultures for common commensals.
Conclusions: Applying a fully automated definition for HOB surveillance was feasible in multiple centers with different data infrastructures, and enabled detection of differences over time at ward and micro-organism-level. HOB surveillance may lead to prevention initiatives in the future.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- van Mourik MSM, van Rooden SM, Abbas M, Aspevall O, Astagneau P, Bonten MJM, et al. PRAISE: providing a roadmap for automated infection surveillance in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021;1:S3–s19. - PubMed
-
- van Mourik MSM, Perencevich EN, Gastmeier P, Bonten MJM. Designing Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections in the Era of Automation and Reporting Mandates. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:970–976. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
