Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e037296.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037296. Epub 2025 Feb 26.

Extracellular Matrix Proteins Improve Risk Prediction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Affiliations

Extracellular Matrix Proteins Improve Risk Prediction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Felicitas Boeckling et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: Cardiac fibrosis is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis and an independent predictor of death. Therefore, we examined the additional value of circulating fibrosis markers as a putative biomarker platform to identify patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) who are at a higher risk of death.

Methods: In this study, 2-year survival analyses were conducted in 378 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR to evaluate the association between fibrosis marker and risk of adverse long-term outcome. Implementation of fibrosis marker into TAVR risk stratification was tested by a machine-learning algorithm.

Results: Among 20 circulating fibrosis markers involved in pathological extracellular matrix remodeling, high tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) levels independently predicted risk of death in univariable (hazard ratio, 5.0 [95% CI, 2.6-9.7]; P<0.001) and multivariable (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.0-4.7]; P=0.046) Cox regression analyses. Consequently, higher TIMP-1 levels offered a significantly higher overall prediction of reduced survival compared with the conventional Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score (area under the curve, 0.753 [95% CI, 0.682-0.824] versus area under the curve, 0.656 [95% CI, 0.578-0.734]; P<0.05). Applying an independent machine-learning algorithm allowed identification of a simple combination of 2 biomarkers (TIMP-1 and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T) with superior prognostic value compared with Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality alone (area under the curve, 0.757 [95% CI, 0.686-0.828] versus 0.656 [95% CI, 0.578-0.34]; P<0.05).

Conclusions: Circulating TIMP-1 is an independent predictor of reduced 2-year overall survival in patients undergoing TAVR. Combined with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, circulating TIMP-1 should be incorporated into risk stratification to identify patients undergoing TAVR who are at a higher risk of death.

Keywords: ECM; TAVR, TAVI, aortic stenosis; TIMP‐1; biomarker; hs‐cTnT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

B.K. reports lecture honoraria for Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi. The remaining authors have no disclosures to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. TIMP‐1 predicts outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR.
A, Distribution of TIMP‐1 levels within the total study cohort in survivors and nonsurvivors. B and C, Landmark analysis with survival curves based on circulating TIMP‐1 (B) and ROC analysis comparing the prognostic value of TIMP‐1 and STS‐PROM (C). AUC indicates area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic [curve]; STS‐PROM, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score Predicted Risk of Mortality; TAVR, transcatheter aortic valve replacement; and TIMP‐1, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase‐1.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Incremental prognostic value of machine learning–derived blood biomarkers to predict outcomes of patients undergoing TAVR.
A, Recursive partitioning survival trees on the selected biomarkers in the total study cohort. B and C, Landmark analysis with Kaplan–Meier plots for patients with TAVR stratified by risk groups defined by XGB‐based machine‐learning model (B) and ROC analysis assessing the prognostic value of a simple 2‐biomarker combination (TIMP‐1 and hs‐cTnT) compared with the conventional risk score STS‐PROM (C). AUC indicates area under the curve; hs‐cTnT high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T; ROC, receiver operating characteristic [curve]; STS‐PROM, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score Predicted Risk of Mortality; TIMP‐1, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase‐1; TnT, troponin T; and XGB, extreme gradient‐boosting.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, Capodanno D, Conradi L, De Bonis M, De Paulis R, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2022;43:561–632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Werner N, Zahn R, Beckmann A, Bauer T, Bleiziffer S, Hamm CW, Berkeredjian R, Berkowitsch A, Mohr FW, Landwehr S, et al. Patients at intermediate surgical risk undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve implantation for severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Circulation. 2018;138:2611–2623. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.117.033048 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kattih B, Carstens DC, Boeckling F, Rasper T, Pergola G, Dimmeler S, Vasa‐Nicotera M, Zeiher AM, Mas‐Peiro S. Low circulating musclin is associated with adverse prognosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation at low‐intermediate risk. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e022792. doi: 10.1161/jaha.121.022792 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Virtanen MPO, Eskola M, Jalava MP, Husso A, Laakso T, Niemelä M, Ahvenvaara T, Tauriainen T, Maaranen P, Kinnunen EM, et al. Comparison of outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs surgical aortic valve replacement among patients with aortic stenosis at low operative risk. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e195742. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5742 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nashef SA, Sharples LD, Roques F, Lockowandt U. EuroSCORE II and the art and science of risk modelling. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43:695–696. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs468 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources