Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;45(1):e70010.
doi: 10.1002/npr2.70010.

Proposal for a Novel Classification of Patients With Enlarged Ventricles and Cognitive Impairment Based on Data-Driven Analysis of Neuroimaging Results in Patients With Psychiatric Disorders

Affiliations

Proposal for a Novel Classification of Patients With Enlarged Ventricles and Cognitive Impairment Based on Data-Driven Analysis of Neuroimaging Results in Patients With Psychiatric Disorders

Yuka Yasuda et al. Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

One of the challenges in diagnosing psychiatric disorders is that the results of biological and neuroscience research are not reflected in the diagnostic criteria. Thus, data-driven analyses incorporating biological and cross-disease perspectives, regardless of the diagnostic category, have recently been proposed. A data-driven clustering study based on subcortical volumes in 5604 subjects classified into four brain biotypes associated with cognitive/social functioning. Among the four brain biotypes identified in controls and patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, autism spectrum disorder, and other psychiatric disorders, we further analyzed the brain biotype 1 subjects, those with an extremely small limbic region, for clinical utility. We found that the representative feature of brain biotype 1 is enlarged lateral ventricles. An enlarged ventricle, defined by an average z-score of left and right lateral ventricle volumes > 3, had a sensitivity of 99.1% and a specificity of 98.1% for discriminating brain biotype 1. However, the presence of an enlarged ventricle was not sufficient to classify patient subgroups, as 1% of the controls also had enlarged ventricles. Reclassification of patients with enlarged ventricles according to cognitive impairment resulted in a stratified subgroup that included patients with a high proportion of schizophrenia diagnoses, electroencephalography abnormalities, and rare pathological genetic copy number variations. Data-driven clustering analysis of neuroimaging data revealed subgroups with enlarged ventricles and cognitive impairment. This subgroup could be a new diagnostic candidate for psychiatric disorders. This concept and strategy may be useful for identifying biologically defined psychiatric disorders in the future.

Keywords: cognitive impairment; copy number variation; data‐driven analysis; enlarged ventricles; schizophrenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Kazutaka Ohi and Reiji Yoshimura are editorial board members of Neuropsychopharmacology Reports and co‐authors of this article. To minimize bias, they were excluded from all editorial decision‐making related to the acceptance of this article for publication. Except for that, no potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
An enlarged ventricle is a representative feature of brain biotype 1 among the four brain biotypes classified by subcortical regional volume. (a) Axial 3D T1‐weighted MR images of a male schizophrenia patient for each brain biotype are shown (red arrows indicate lateral ventricles). Brain biotype 1: 30 years old; brain biotype 2: 34 years old; brain biotype 3: 30 years old; brain biotype 4: 31 years old. (b) The mean and standard deviation of the normalized volume (z score) of each subcortical region in each brain biotype are shown. The mean normalized volumes in each subcortical region were adjusted for age, sex, and intracranial volume in each MRI scanner.

References

    1. Clark L. A., Cuthbert B., Lewis‐Fernández R., Narrow W. E., and Reed G. M., “Three Approaches to Understanding and Classifying Mental Disorder: ICD‐11, DSM‐5, and the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC),” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 18, no. 2 (2017): 72–145. - PubMed
    1. Insel T., Cuthbert B., Garvey M., et al., “Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders,” American Journal of Psychiatry 167, no. 7 (2010): 748–751. - PubMed
    1. Tandon R., Nasrallah H., Akbarian S., et al., “The Schizophrenia Syndrome, Circa 2024: What We Know and How That Informs Its Nature,” Schizophrenia Research 264 (2023): 1–28. - PubMed
    1. Thompson P. M., Jahanshad N., Ching C. R. K., et al., “ENIGMA and Global Neuroscience: A Decade of Large‐Scale Studies of the Brain in Health and Disease Across More Than 40 Countries,” Translational Psychiatry 10, no. 1 (2020): 100. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Onitsuka T., Hirano Y., Nemoto K., et al., “Trends in Big Data Analyses by Multicenter Collaborative Translational Research in Psychiatry,” Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 76, no. 1 (2022): 1–14. - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding