HDAC inhibitors modulate Hippo pathway signaling in hormone positive breast cancer
- PMID: 40012020
- PMCID: PMC11863526
- DOI: 10.1186/s13148-025-01834-y
HDAC inhibitors modulate Hippo pathway signaling in hormone positive breast cancer
Abstract
Breast cancer has constantly been the leading causes of death in women, and hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative is the majority subtype. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors (HDACi) have shown clinical benefit in HR ( +) breast cancer patients. The Hippo pathway is an important cellular pathway involving proliferation, cell contact, and cancer. Hippo pathway proteins YAP/TAZ are often viewed as pro-tumorigenic; however, recent studies support a role of YAP as a tumor suppressor in HR ( +) breast cancer. Few studies have investigated the link between HDACi and the Hippo pathway. In our study, we demonstrate that HDACi induces transcriptional downregulation of YAP expression, while conversely activating a TEAD-mediated transcriptional program with upregulation of canonical Hippo pathway genes. We subsequently identified four Hippo canonical genes (CCDC80, GADD45A, F3, and TGFB2) that were upregulated by HDACi and associated with significantly improved survival in a HR ( +) breast cancer cohort. We further validated experimentally that HR ( +) breast cancer cells treated with HDACi resulted in upregulation of CCDC80 and GADD45A. A pan-cancer analysis of TCGA database demonstrated lower CCDC80 and GADD45A expression in tumor tissue compared to non-tumor samples in BRCA (breast cancer), LAML (acute myeloid leukemia), and UCS (uterine carcinosarcoma). Further analysis of HR ( +) breast cancer patients in the METABRIC dataset revealed high CCDC80 and/or GADD45A expression associated with significantly better survival outcomes compared to patients with low expression. Our study provides evidence for a novel mechanism of HDACi clinical activity, as well as a potential role for CCDC80 and GADD45A in HR ( +) breast cancer.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethics approval and consent to participate as below. Consent for publication: No individual patient data or sample were used in this study, with the exception of the public database from METABRIC [44] and GEPIA2 database (described in methods). Data analyses were in compliance with cBioPortal ( https://www.cbioportal.org/ ) data analysis guidelines. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures




References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):7–30. - PubMed
-
- Duggan C, Trapani D, Ilbawi AM, Fidarova E, Laversanne M, Curigliano G, et al. National health system characteristics, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and breast cancer mortality: a population-based analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(11):1632–42. - PubMed
-
- Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406(6797):747–52. - PubMed
-
- Goetz MP, Toi M, Campone M, Sohn J, Paluch-Shimon S, Huober J, et al. MONARCH 3: abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2017;35(32):3638–46. - PubMed
-
- Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, et al. Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1738–48. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous