Estimating per-infection cost and burden for dengue and Zika as a function of antibody-dependent enhancement
- PMID: 40014622
- PMCID: PMC11906165
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012876
Estimating per-infection cost and burden for dengue and Zika as a function of antibody-dependent enhancement
Abstract
The complex immune interactions produced by the tetravalent dengue vaccine Dengvaxia have foregrounded the important role of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in dengue infection. Some evidence exists that ADE may extend beyond the four dengue serotypes to Zika, a closely related flavivirus transmitted by the same mosquito species as dengue, and may also account for the increased severity of some cases. Estimates of the public health impact of dengue vaccination may then need to include its effects on the transmission of Zika in addition to dengue. This study gathers primary references to build estimates of per-case economic cost and disease burden for dengue and Zika infection with and without ADE in the ten countries where clinical trials were held for Dengvaxia, under the hypothesis that severe outcomes are associated with ADE of disease. From these estimates, per-infection weighted averages are developed (without assumptions on transmission dynamics or case totals) which will facilitate population-level estimates of the potential impact of dengue vaccination on a dual outbreak using mathematical modeling. Results estimate that ADE amplifies the per-case toll of dengue by a factor of 2-16 but increases that of a Zika case by more than two orders of magnitude due to the greater risk of severe consequences. As expected, dengue vaccination affects per-infection dengue toll much more when high prior dengue seropositivity involves a different serotype than the one(s) circulating, but that same high dengue seropositivity makes vaccination exacerbate Zika toll less.
Copyright: © 2025 Christopher M. Kribs. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CreativeCommonsAttributionLicense, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
-
Impact of ADE and Dengue Vaccination with Screening on Cost and Disease Burden for Homoserotypic Dengue and Zika.Bull Math Biol. 2025 Apr 4;87(5):62. doi: 10.1007/s11538-025-01440-2. Bull Math Biol. 2025. PMID: 40183845
-
Dengue and Zika virus infections are enhanced by live attenuated dengue vaccine but not by recombinant DSV4 vaccine candidate in mouse models.EBioMedicine. 2020 Oct;60:102991. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102991. Epub 2020 Sep 16. EBioMedicine. 2020. PMID: 32949997 Free PMC article.
-
Modulation of Dengue/Zika Virus Pathogenicity by Antibody-Dependent Enhancement and Strategies to Protect Against Enhancement in Zika Virus Infection.Front Immunol. 2018 Apr 23;9:597. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00597. eCollection 2018. Front Immunol. 2018. PMID: 29740424 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of tetravalent dengue vaccination with screening, ADE, and altered infectivity on single-serotype dengue and Zika transmission.J Math Biol. 2023 Apr 29;86(5):85. doi: 10.1007/s00285-023-01915-7. J Math Biol. 2023. PMID: 37119296
-
Cross-reactive dengue virus-derived monoclonal antibodies to Zika virus envelope protein: Panacea or Pandora's box?BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Dec 10;18(1):641. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3572-0. BMC Infect Dis. 2018. PMID: 30526531 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization. Vector-borne diseases, 2020 March 2 [cited 2024 Jan 12]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/vector-borne-diseases
-
- SAGE Working Group on Dengue Vaccines and WHO Secretariat. Background paper on dengue vaccines. 2018 Apr 18 [cited 2021 Oct 01]. https://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2018/april/2_DengueBackgr...
-
- Valiant WG, Mattapallil MJ, Higgs S, Huang Y-JS, Vanlandingham DL, Lewis MG, et al.. Simultaneous coinfection of macaques with Zika and dengue viruses does not enhance acute plasma viremia but leads to activation of monocyte subsets and biphasic release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):7877. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44323-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
