Epidemiology and Prognostic Significance of Acute Noncardiac Organ Dysfunction Across Cardiogenic Shock Subtypes
- PMID: 40015594
- PMCID: PMC12353354
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.12.017
Epidemiology and Prognostic Significance of Acute Noncardiac Organ Dysfunction Across Cardiogenic Shock Subtypes
Abstract
Background: The epidemiology and prognostic significance of acute noncardiac organ dysfunction across cardiogenic shock (CS) subtypes are not well-defined.
Methods: CS admissions from 2017 to 2022 in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry were classified as acute myocardial infarction-related CS (AMI-CS), acute-on-chronic heart failure-related CS (AoC HF-CS), or de novo HF-CS, and categorized as having at least moderate respiratory, kidney, liver, and/or neurological dysfunction using established criteria. Burden of organ dysfunction was defined as no noncardiac organ dysfunction (NOD), single organ dysfunction, or multiorgan dysfunction (≥2) (MOD). Multivariable models were used to evaluate associations of burden and type of noncardiac organ dysfunction with in-hospital death.
Results: Among 3904 CS admissions, 29.4% had AMI-CS, 50.9% had AoC HF-CS, and 19.7% had de novo HF-CS. AMI-CS and de novo HF-CS had greater prevalence of MOD (35.0% and 33.9%, respectively) compared with AoC HF-CS (23.1%; P < .01). In-hospital mortality was higher with a greater burden of organ dysfunction in the overall CS cohort (single organ dysfunction vs NOD, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for in-hospital death 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-3.2; MOD vs NOD: aOR 6.5, 95% CI 5.1-8.2) and across each CS subtype. Kidney dysfunction was the most prognostically important form of organ dysfunction in the overall cohort (aOR 4.1, 95% CI 3.4-5.0) and for each CS subtype.
Conclusions: Admissions for AoC HF-CS had a lower burden of acute noncardiac organ dysfunction compared with admissions for de novo HF-CS and AMI-CS. However, acute noncardiac organ dysfunction burden was similarly adversely prognostic across all CS subtypes.
Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; heart failure; organ dysfunction; outcomes.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest AV reports consulting fees from Broadview Ventures, Hippocratic AI, Baim Institute for Clinical Research, and ECHAS. DB has received honoraria from the Medical Education Speakers Network and USV Private Limited; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, MobilityBio, Pfizer, and Youngene Therapeutics; and serves on clinical endpoint committees for studies sponsored by Beckman Coulter, CeleCor, Kowa Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, and Tosoh Biosciences. JT reports relationships with Abbott (consulting), Abiomed (ad board), Broadview Ventures (consulting), CareDx (ad board, speaking), Cytokinetics (speaking), Medtronic (ad board, speaking, consulting), Paragonix (speaking), and Takeda (ad board). MK reports being a clinical trial end point adjudicator for Beckman Coulter. MS reports research support from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center intramural research funds. EB, SP, DM, and DB are members of the TIMI Study Group, which has received institutional research grant support through Brigham and Women's Hospital from Abbott Laboratories, Abiomed, Amgen, Anthos Therapeutics, Arca Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Daiichi‐Sankyo, Intarcia, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Poxel, Quark Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Roche, Siemens, and Zora Biosciences. DM has received consulting fees from Abbott Laboratories, Arca Biopharma, InCarda, Inflammatix, Merck, Novartis, Regeneron, and Roche Diagnostics. All other authors have no relevant disclosures.
References
-
- Berg DD, Bohula EA, Morrow DA. Epidemiology and causes of cardiogenic shock. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2021. May 19; - PubMed
-
- Waksman R, Pahuja M, van Diepen S, Proudfoot AG, Morrow D, Spitzer E, et al. Standardized Definitions for Cardiogenic Shock Research and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: Scientific Expert Panel From the Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC). Circulation. 2023. Oct 3;148(14):1113–26. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lawler PR, Berg DD, Park JG, Katz JN, Baird-Zars VM, Barsness GW, et al. The Range of Cardiogenic Shock Survival by Clinical Stage: Data From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry. Crit Care Med. 2021. Aug 1;49(8):1293–302. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous