Cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumor DNA profiling for risk stratification and matched treatment of central nervous system metastases
- PMID: 40016451
- DOI: 10.1038/s41591-025-03538-5
Cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumor DNA profiling for risk stratification and matched treatment of central nervous system metastases
Abstract
Genomic profiling of central nervous system (CNS) metastases has the potential to guide treatments. In the present study, we included 584 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and CNS metastases and performed a comprehensive analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) with clinicopathological annotation. CSF ctDNA-positive detection was independently associated with shorter survival than negative detection (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.9, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.56-2.39; P < 0.0001). Matched tumor-CSF analysis characterized the CSF private molecular features causing poor survival (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.15-2.32, P = 0.006). A multimetric CSF ctDNA prognostic model integrating CSF ctDNA features and clinical factors was developed for risk-stratifying CNS metastases and validated in an independent cohort. Among patients with treatment histories available, those positive for a driver alteration by CSF ctDNA showed a survival benefit from CSF-matched therapy (HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.65-0.92, P = 0.003). Longitudinal monitoring by CSF identified CNS-specific resistant mechanisms and a second matched targeted therapy indicating improved survival (HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.35-0.91, P = 0.018). These findings support the clinical value of CSF ctDNA for risk-stratifying CNS metastases and guiding therapy.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Q.Z. declares honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi outside the submitted work. W.Z.Z. declares honoraria from AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche and Innovent outside the submitted work. Y.L.W. declares: advisory services for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Takeda; speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Beigene, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi; and grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Hengrui and Roche outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Gillespie, C. S. et al. Genomic alterations and the incidence of brain metastases in advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Thorac. Oncol. 18, 1703–1713 (2023). - PubMed
-
- Li, Y. S. et al. Leptomeningeal metastases in patients with NSCLC with EGFR mutations. J. Thorac. Oncol. 11, 1962–1969 (2016). - PubMed
-
- Zheng, M. M. et al. Clinical utility of cerebrospinal fluid cell-free DNA as liquid biopsy for leptomeningeal metastases in ALK-rearranged NSCLC. J. Thorac. Oncol. 14, 924–932 (2019). - PubMed
-
- Sperduto, P. W. et al. Estimating survival in patients With lung cancer and brain metastases: an update of the graded prognostic assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (lung-molGPA). JAMA Oncol. 3, 827–831 (2017). - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical