Benefits of a near-peer program from the tutors' perspective: a survey of Australian junior doctors in a regional teaching program
- PMID: 40016710
- PMCID: PMC11866562
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-06762-2
Benefits of a near-peer program from the tutors' perspective: a survey of Australian junior doctors in a regional teaching program
Abstract
Background: Near-peer teaching has been shown to provide diverse benefits for both tutees and tutors in senior medical student and junior trainee settings. However, junior trainees may face more obstacles in teaching including competing clinical priorities and time management. We sought to investigate the challenges and benefits of engaging in near-peer teaching for junior trainees within our local context. Our Near-Peer Medical Teaching (NPMT) teaching program is designed and facilitated by junior doctors for medical students at the Central Coast Clinical School (University of Newcastle) of the Joint Medical Program.
Methods: Current and past NPMT tutors participated in an online survey from October 2022 to April 2023. Tutors were asked about feasibility of teaching within a work environment, perceived benefits from their experience and attitudes towards medical education.
Results: Teaching experience appears to be influenced by competing clinical priorities and convenience of session times, but it does not appear to exert considerable stress on tutors likely due to self-selection of tutors with prior enjoyable teaching experience. Furthermore, this study indicates that junior doctors derived enjoyment and developed clinical skills and professional qualities, which are important factors in increasing job satisfaction and ameliorating burn-out in this cohort.
Conclusions: Junior doctors appear to benefit from engaging in near-peer programs in the Australian teaching hospital setting. Further research should include qualitative methodologies to explore the perspectives of Australian junior doctors' more deeply.
Keywords: Junior doctor; Near-peer teaching; Teaching program; Tutor perspective.
© 2025. Crown.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Data were collected in accordance with the Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research [38]. Our study received approval from the Central Coast Local Research Office (HREC 0822 063C). The study was as approved as a Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) Exempt Low/ Negligible Risk (LNR) project and therefore did not undergo HREC review. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Gregory A, Walker I, McLaughlin K, Peets AD. Both preparing to teach and teaching positively impact learning outcomes for peer teachers. Med Teach. 2011;33(8):e417–22. - PubMed
-
- Benè KL, Bergus G. When learners become teachers: a review of peer teaching in medical student education. Fam Med. 2014;46(10):783–7. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
