Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 28;51(1):46-53.
doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2025.51.1.46.

Temporomandibular joint capsule suspension for neocondyle stability in free fibular flap reconstruction of the mandibular condyle

Affiliations

Temporomandibular joint capsule suspension for neocondyle stability in free fibular flap reconstruction of the mandibular condyle

Shuang Bai et al. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluates the efficacy of a new temporomandibular joint (TMJ) capsule suspension technique for stabilizing the TMJ after free fibular flap reconstruction of the mandibular condyle.

Patients and methods: Patients undergoing the TMJ capsule suspension technique during free fibular flap reconstruction after mandibulectomy with condylectomy (study group; n=9) were compared with a control group (n=9). Mandibular movement trajectory and surface electromyographic signals of bilateral masseters were recorded. The neocondyle-disc relationship was examined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6 months after surgery.

Results: Maximal mouth opening and bilateral marginal movement distances were comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). The asymmetry index of the condyle path length was significantly higher in controls (P=0.02). Bilateral mouth opening trajectories were symmetric in 7 patients and deviated to the affected side in 2 patients in the study group; they deviated to the affected side in all controls. The mean electromyographic values of the masseter on the affected side in resting, maximum bite, and chewing states were comparable between the two groups (P=0.13, P=0.65, and P=0.82, respectively). On MRI at 6 months, the thicknesses of the anterior, medial, and posterior bands and TMJ disc length were similar on the affected and normal sides in the study group (P=0.57, P=0.13, P=0.48, and P=0.87, respectively).

Conclusion: The proposed TMJ capsule suspension technique could improve postoperative TMJ structure and function after fibular free flap reconstruction following mandibulectomy with condylectomy.

Keywords: Mandibular reconstruction; Masticatory muscles; Temporomandibular joint.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) capsule suspension technique. A. Suture between the anteromedial wall of TMJ capsule and the anteromedial hole on the fibula. B. Suture between the anterolateral hole on the fibula and the anterolateral wall of TMJ capsule. C. Suture between the posteromedial wall of TMJ capsule and the posteromedial hole on the fibula. D. Suture between the posterolateral hole on the fibula and the posterolateral wall of TMJ capsule. E. Suspension suture performed in a horizontal mattress suture style. F. Neocondyle seated in the glenoid fossa after the sutures are tied.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Measurement of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc thickness at the level of anterior, intermediate, and posterior bands (left). Measurement of TMJ disc length (right).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of mean electromyographic value of masseter on the affected side in the TMJ capsule suspension group and the control group. (TMJ: temporomandibular joint)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of anterior, intermediate, and posterior band thickness, and length of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc, between the affected side and normal side in the TMJ capsule suspension group.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
A representative case. Temporomandibular joint magnetic resonance images obtained at 12 months after surgery. A. Mouth closing. B. Mouth opening.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Intraoperative photograph of temporomandibular joint capsule suspension technique.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
A representative case. Mandibular movement assessments at 12 months after the surgery showed symmetric bilateral condyle movement trajectory.

References

    1. González-García R, Naval-Gías L, Rodríguez-Campo FJ, Martínez-Chacón JL, Gil-Díez Usandizaga JL. Vascularized fibular flap for reconstruction of the condyle after mandibular ablation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1133–7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.680. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gravvanis A, Koumoullis HD, Anterriotis D, Tsoutsos D, Katsikeris N. Recurrent giant mandibular ameloblastoma in young adults. Head Neck. 2016;38 Suppl 1:E1947–54. doi: 10.1002/hed.24352. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24352. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jewer DD, Boyd JB, Manktelow RT, Zuker RM, Rosen IB, Gullane PJ, et al. Orofacial and mandibular reconstruction with the iliac crest free flap: a review of 60 cases and a new method of classification. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:391–403. discussion 404–5. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198909000-00001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yu Y, Zhang WB, Liu XJ, Guo CB, Yu GY, Peng X. Three-dimensional accuracy of virtual planning and surgical navigation for mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:1503.e1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.02.020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.02.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ishida S, Shibuya Y, Kobayashi M, Komori T. Assessing stomatognathic performance after mandibulectomy according to the method of mandibular reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:948–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.03.011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.03.011. - DOI - PubMed