Temporomandibular joint capsule suspension for neocondyle stability in free fibular flap reconstruction of the mandibular condyle
- PMID: 40017074
- PMCID: PMC11880677
- DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2025.51.1.46
Temporomandibular joint capsule suspension for neocondyle stability in free fibular flap reconstruction of the mandibular condyle
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluates the efficacy of a new temporomandibular joint (TMJ) capsule suspension technique for stabilizing the TMJ after free fibular flap reconstruction of the mandibular condyle.
Patients and methods: Patients undergoing the TMJ capsule suspension technique during free fibular flap reconstruction after mandibulectomy with condylectomy (study group; n=9) were compared with a control group (n=9). Mandibular movement trajectory and surface electromyographic signals of bilateral masseters were recorded. The neocondyle-disc relationship was examined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 6 months after surgery.
Results: Maximal mouth opening and bilateral marginal movement distances were comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). The asymmetry index of the condyle path length was significantly higher in controls (P=0.02). Bilateral mouth opening trajectories were symmetric in 7 patients and deviated to the affected side in 2 patients in the study group; they deviated to the affected side in all controls. The mean electromyographic values of the masseter on the affected side in resting, maximum bite, and chewing states were comparable between the two groups (P=0.13, P=0.65, and P=0.82, respectively). On MRI at 6 months, the thicknesses of the anterior, medial, and posterior bands and TMJ disc length were similar on the affected and normal sides in the study group (P=0.57, P=0.13, P=0.48, and P=0.87, respectively).
Conclusion: The proposed TMJ capsule suspension technique could improve postoperative TMJ structure and function after fibular free flap reconstruction following mandibulectomy with condylectomy.
Keywords: Mandibular reconstruction; Masticatory muscles; Temporomandibular joint.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures







References
-
- González-García R, Naval-Gías L, Rodríguez-Campo FJ, Martínez-Chacón JL, Gil-Díez Usandizaga JL. Vascularized fibular flap for reconstruction of the condyle after mandibular ablation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:1133–7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.06.680. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gravvanis A, Koumoullis HD, Anterriotis D, Tsoutsos D, Katsikeris N. Recurrent giant mandibular ameloblastoma in young adults. Head Neck. 2016;38 Suppl 1:E1947–54. doi: 10.1002/hed.24352. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24352. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Jewer DD, Boyd JB, Manktelow RT, Zuker RM, Rosen IB, Gullane PJ, et al. Orofacial and mandibular reconstruction with the iliac crest free flap: a review of 60 cases and a new method of classification. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:391–403. discussion 404–5. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198909000-00001. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yu Y, Zhang WB, Liu XJ, Guo CB, Yu GY, Peng X. Three-dimensional accuracy of virtual planning and surgical navigation for mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74:1503.e1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.02.020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2016.02.020. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ishida S, Shibuya Y, Kobayashi M, Komori T. Assessing stomatognathic performance after mandibulectomy according to the method of mandibular reconstruction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44:948–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.03.011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.03.011. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources