Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 26;11(1):20552173251315457.
doi: 10.1177/20552173251315457. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.

Treatment persistence and clinical outcomes in patients starting B cell depleting therapies within the Swiss MS Cohort

Affiliations

Treatment persistence and clinical outcomes in patients starting B cell depleting therapies within the Swiss MS Cohort

Giulio Disanto et al. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. .

Abstract

Background: Persistence to B cell depleting therapies (BCDT) like ocrelizumab and rituximab may be higher compared with other disease-modifying therapies (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical trials directly comparing these treatments are lacking.

Objective: To compare the risk of treatment discontinuation, relapse, and confirmed disability worsening in patients starting BCDT vs other DMT within real-world settings.

Methods: In a longitudinal cohort study, patients with relapsing MS starting BCDT (ocrelizumab/rituximab, n = 269) after enrolment into the Swiss MS Cohort (SMSC) were evaluated for treatment discontinuation, occurrence of relapses, and disability worsening in comparison with platform (n = 57) and oral (n = 454) DMT, or natalizumab (n = 73) using Cox regression with double robust adjustment for baseline covariates.

Results: Patients starting BCDT were less likely to discontinue treatment than all other DMT combined (HR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.18-0.36, p < .01), oral DMT (HR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.20-0.39, p < .01) and natalizumab (HR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.21-0.58, p < .01). BCDT were associated with lower risk of relapses as compared to oral DMT HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.39-0.88, p < .01), but not to natalizumab (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.45-1.82, p = .778). Disability worsening was not significantly different between treatment groups.

Conclusion: We provide real-world evidence for patients being more persistent to BCDT than to other treatments, and better clinical outcomes may partly explain this.

Keywords: Multiple sclerosis; clinical outcomes; disease-modifying treatment; persistence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan-Meier curves with numbers at risk showing the proportion of patients who remained on treatment with the index DMT over the study period (BCDT in red versus oral DMT in green on the left side, and BCDT in red versus NTZ in blue on the right side). BCDT: B cell depleting therapies; DMT: disease modifying therapies; NTZ: natalizumab.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier curves with numbers at risk showing the proportion of patients who remained free of relapses during treatment with the index DMT over the study period (BCDT in red versus oral DMT in green on the left side, and BCDT in red versus NTZ in blue on the right side). BCDT: B cell depleting therapies; DMT: disease modifying treatments; NTZ: natalizumab.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves with numbers at risk showing the proportion of patients who remained free of 6-month CDW stratified by index DMT (BCDT in red versus oral DMT in green on the left side, and BCDT in red versus NTZ in blue on the right side). All EDSS worsening events occurred up to 4 years after termination of index DMT were considered. BCDT: B cell depleting therapies; CDW: confirmed disability worsening; DMT: disease-modifying therapies; NTZ: natalizumab.

References

    1. Wiendl H, Gold R, Berger T, et al. Multiple sclerosis therapy consensus group (MSTCG): position statement on disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (white paper). Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2021; 14: 17562864211039648. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hauser SL, Cree BAC. Treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review. Am J Med 2020; 133: 1380–1390.e2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Comi G, et al. Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 221–234. - PubMed
    1. Montalban X, Hauser SL, Kappos L, et al. Ocrelizumab versus placebo in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 209–220. - PubMed
    1. Hauser SL, Waubant E, Arnold DL, et al. B-cell depletion with rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 676–688. - PubMed