Treatment persistence and clinical outcomes in patients starting B cell depleting therapies within the Swiss MS Cohort
- PMID: 40017897
- PMCID: PMC11866361
- DOI: 10.1177/20552173251315457
Treatment persistence and clinical outcomes in patients starting B cell depleting therapies within the Swiss MS Cohort
Abstract
Background: Persistence to B cell depleting therapies (BCDT) like ocrelizumab and rituximab may be higher compared with other disease-modifying therapies (DMT) in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical trials directly comparing these treatments are lacking.
Objective: To compare the risk of treatment discontinuation, relapse, and confirmed disability worsening in patients starting BCDT vs other DMT within real-world settings.
Methods: In a longitudinal cohort study, patients with relapsing MS starting BCDT (ocrelizumab/rituximab, n = 269) after enrolment into the Swiss MS Cohort (SMSC) were evaluated for treatment discontinuation, occurrence of relapses, and disability worsening in comparison with platform (n = 57) and oral (n = 454) DMT, or natalizumab (n = 73) using Cox regression with double robust adjustment for baseline covariates.
Results: Patients starting BCDT were less likely to discontinue treatment than all other DMT combined (HR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.18-0.36, p < .01), oral DMT (HR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.20-0.39, p < .01) and natalizumab (HR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.21-0.58, p < .01). BCDT were associated with lower risk of relapses as compared to oral DMT HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.39-0.88, p < .01), but not to natalizumab (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.45-1.82, p = .778). Disability worsening was not significantly different between treatment groups.
Conclusion: We provide real-world evidence for patients being more persistent to BCDT than to other treatments, and better clinical outcomes may partly explain this.
Keywords: Multiple sclerosis; clinical outcomes; disease-modifying treatment; persistence.
© The Author(s), 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Hauser SL, Bar-Or A, Comi G, et al. Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 221–234. - PubMed
-
- Montalban X, Hauser SL, Kappos L, et al. Ocrelizumab versus placebo in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 209–220. - PubMed
-
- Hauser SL, Waubant E, Arnold DL, et al. B-cell depletion with rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 676–688. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
