Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 28;15(1):7247.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90855-x.

Carbon dioxide removal from triethanolamine solution using living microalgae-loofah biocomposites

Affiliations

Carbon dioxide removal from triethanolamine solution using living microalgae-loofah biocomposites

Tanakit Komkhum et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Nowadays, the climate change crisis is an urgent matter in which carbon dioxide (CO2) is a major greenhouse gas contributing to global warming. Amine solvents are commonly used for CO2 capture with high efficiency and absorption rates. However, solvent regeneration consumes an extensive amount of energy. One of alternative approaches is amine regeneration through microalgae. Recently, living biocomposites, intensifying traditional suspended cultivation, have been developed. With this technology, immobilizing microalgae on biocompatible materials with binder outperformed the suspended system in terms of CO2 capture rates. In this study, living microalgae-loofah biocomposites with immobilized Scenedesmus acuminatus TISTR 8457 using 5%v/v acrylic medium were tested to remove CO2 from CO2-rich triethanolamine (TEA) solutions. The test using 1 M TEA at various CO2 loading ratios (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mol CO2/mol TEA) demonstrated that the biocomposites achieved CO2 removal rates 3 to 5 times higher than the suspended cell system over 28 days, with the highest removal observed at the 1 M with 0.4 mol CO2/mol TEA (4.34 ± 0.20 gCO2/gbiomass). This study triggers a new exploration of integration between biological and chemical processes that could elevate the traditional amine-based CO2 capture capabilities. Nevertheless, pilot-scale investigations are necessary to confirm the biocomposites's efficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: All authors of this manuscript declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the outcome or interpretation of this study. Specifically, they affirm that they have no financial relationships with any organizations or individuals that may have a direct or indirect interest in the subject matter discussed in this manuscript. Additionally, they have no financial relationships, such as employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or patents, that may be perceived as having influenced the research conducted or the conclusions drawn. Furthermore, the authors confirm that there are no other associations or conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, that could potentially affect the impartiality, objectivity, or integrity of this work. This declaration is made with the understanding that any undisclosed competing interests discovered after publication that are relevant to the study will be promptly disclosed to the journal editor. In short, all the authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of experimental procedure: (a) TEA preparation, (b) biocomposites fabrication, (c) TEA tolerance test, (d) binder toxicity test, (e) binder adhesion test, and (f) CO2 removal test.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
TEA tolerance test of S. acuminatus to TEA solution at different concentrations: (a) 0.005, (b) 0.05, (c) 0.5, (d) 1, and (e) 2 M, using CO2 loading levels of 0, 0.4, and 0.8 mol CO2/mol TEA, respectively, over a period of 7 days. Bar chart indicates cell density. CL = CO2 loading, uppercase letters represent the effect of the same CO2 loading levels from day 0 to day 7, and lowercase letters represent the effect of different CO2 loading levels on the same day. The same letters indicate that the mean values of those data sets are not statistically significantly different (p > 0.05) using Tukey’s post hoc analysis. (Mean formula image StDev; n = 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
TEA tolerance test of S. acuminatus to TEA solution at different concentrations: (a) 0.005, (b) 0.05, (c) 0.5, (d) 1, and (e) 2 M, using CO2 loading levels of 0, 0.4, and 0.8 mol CO2/mol TEA, respectively, over a period of 7 days. Solid line graph indicates pH with microalgae, and the dashed line graph indicates pH without microalgae. CL = CO2 loading.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(a) Binder toxicity test of acrylic medium to S. acuminatus using specific growth rate along with (b) images of the test over 7 days, (c) binder adhesion test of cells on the biocomposites at different the binder ratios (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 20, 40, and 60%v/v) using cumulative percentage of cell released, and (d) decision matrix for selecting the appropriate binder ratio; the same lower case letters indicate that the mean values of those data sets are not significantly different (p > 0.05) using Tukey’s post hoc analysis (Mean formula image StDev; n = 3).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
SEM images present the morphology of the microalgae-loofah biocomposites before and after the binder adhesion test at binder ratios of 0% (a and b), 5% (c and d), and 60% (e and f) %v/v, respectively, at 500formula image magnification.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
CO2 removal test using the biocomposites system (B) and the suspension system (S) from (a) TEA solution at CO2 loading of 0.8 mol CO2/mol TEA, with varying TEA solution concentrations (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 M, respectively) and (b) 1 M TEA solution at different CO2 loading levels (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 mol CO2/mol TEA, respectively), over a period of 28 days. Every 4 days, the TEA solutions were measured the amount of CO2 removed and the TEA solutions were refreshed into the bottle with the same concentration and CO2 loading. (Mean formula image StDev; n = 3).

References

    1. Global Monitoring Laboratory. Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/ (2024).
    1. Lee, H. et al. Climate change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 35–115. 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647 (2023).
    1. Skjånes, K., Lindblad, P. & Muller, J. BioCO2–A multidisciplinary, biological approach using solar energy to capture CO2 while producing H2 and high value products. Biomol. Eng.24 (4), 405–413. 10.1016/j.bioeng.2007.06.002 (2007). - PubMed
    1. Harper, A. B. et al. Land-use emissions play a critical role in land-based mitigation for Paris climate targets. Nat. Commun.9 (1), 2938. 10.1038/s41467-018-05340-z (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goswami, R. K., Mehariya, S. & Verma, P. Advances in microalgae-based carbon sequestration: current status and future perspectives. Environ. Res.249, 118397. 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118397 (2024). - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources