Predicting the need for diabetic macular oedema treatment from photographic screening in the Singapore Integrated Diabetic Retinopathy Programme (SiDRP)
- PMID: 40021782
- PMCID: PMC12130208
- DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03725-1
Predicting the need for diabetic macular oedema treatment from photographic screening in the Singapore Integrated Diabetic Retinopathy Programme (SiDRP)
Abstract
Objective: To identify diabetic maculopathy features from photographic screening that are predictive of treatment on referral to a tertiary care centre.
Methods: Retrospective review of participants who underwent screening by Singapore Integrated Diabetic Retinopathy Programme from 2015 to 2019. Participants underwent visual acuity (VA) test and non-stereoscopic retinal photographs. Maculopathy features include haemorrhages, microaneurysm and hard exudates (HE), stratified by inner and outer zone (1 and 1-2 disc diameter from fovea respectively) and VA of 6/12. Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) treatment was defined as intravitreal injection or macular photocoagulation up to 540 days from point of referral.
Results: 16,712 patients screened had referable eye disease. Out of 3518 maculopathy suspects, 281 (8.0%) received DMO treatment within 540 days. Those treated for DMO had shorter duration of diabetes (6.90 vs. 9.13 years, p < 0.001), higher total cholesterol (4.65 ± 1.20 vs. 4.36 ± 1.13 mmol/L, p = 0.001) and LDL cholesterol (2.59 ± 1.05 vs. 2.37 ± 0.93 mmol/L, p < 0.05) than those without treatment. High-risk features, including inner zone haemorrhages with VA ≤ 6/12 (HR 12.0, 95% CI: 5.5-25.9) and inner zone hard exudates (HR 7.4, 95% CI: 3.4-15.8), significantly increased the likelihood of requiring DMO treatment compared to low-risk features. Higher body mass index is protective of DMO treatment in mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (HR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.97).
Conclusion: Haemorrhages, microaneurysms and HE within inner zone are important photographic features predictive of DMO treatment. VA is an important stratification for screening especially in patients with only visible haemorrhages.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures


References
-
- Cheung N, Mitchell P, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet. 2010;376:124–36. - PubMed
-
- Li JQ, Welchowski T, Schmid M, Letow J, Wolpers C, Pascual-Camps I, et al. Prevalence, incidence and future projection of diabetic eye disease in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35:11–23. - PubMed
-
- Tan GS, Gan A, Sabanayagam C, Tham YC, Neelam K, Mitchell P, et al. Ethnic differences in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:529–36. - PubMed
-
- Nguyen QD, Brown DM, Marcus DM, Boyer DS, Patel S, Feiner L, et al. Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:789–801. - PubMed