Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar 3;17(1):16.
doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00337-5.

Expert consensus on intentional tooth replantation

Affiliations
Review

Expert consensus on intentional tooth replantation

Zhengmei Lin et al. Int J Oral Sci. .

Abstract

Intentional tooth replantation (ITR) is an advanced treatment modality and the procedure of last resort for preserving teeth with inaccessible endodontic or resorptive lesions. ITR is defined as the deliberate extraction of a tooth; evaluation of the root surface, endodontic manipulation, and repair; and placement of the tooth back into its original socket. Case reports, case series, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of ITR in the retention of natural teeth that are untreatable or difficult to manage with root canal treatment or endodontic microsurgery. However, variations in clinical protocols for ITR exist due to the empirical nature of the original protocols and rapid advancements in the field of oral biology and dental materials. This heterogeneity in protocols may cause confusion among dental practitioners; therefore, guidelines and considerations for ITR should be explicated. This expert consensus discusses the biological foundation of ITR, the available clinical protocols and current status of ITR in treating teeth with refractory apical periodontitis or anatomical aberration, and the main complications of this treatment, aiming to refine the clinical management of ITR in accordance with the progress of basic research and clinical studies; the findings suggest that ITR may become a more consistent evidence-based option in dental treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Decision-making flowchart for management of teeth with periapical diseases that fail to initial root canal treatment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic diagram of ITR

References

    1. Fernandez, R., Cardona, J. A., Cadavid, D., Alvarez, L. G. & Restrepo, F. A. Survival of Endodontically Treated Roots/Teeth Based on Periapical Health and Retention: A 10-year Retrospective Cohort Study. J. Endod.43, 2001–2008 (2017). - PubMed
    1. Chybowski, E. A. et al. Clinical Outcome of Non-Surgical Root Canal Treatment Using a Single-cone Technique with Endosequence Bioceramic Sealer: A Retrospective Analysis. J. Endod.44, 941–945 (2018). - PubMed
    1. Rouhani, A., Javidi, B., Habibi, M. & Jafarzadeh, H. Intentional replantation: a procedure as a last resort. J. Contemp. Dent. Pr.12, 486–492 (2011). - PubMed
    1. Grossman, L. I. Intentional replantation of teeth: a clinical evaluation. J. Am. Dent. Assoc.104, 633–639 (1982). - PubMed
    1. Mainkar, A. A Systematic Review of the Survival of Teeth Intentionally Replanted with a Modern Technique and Cost-effectiveness Compared with Single-tooth Implants. J. Endod.43, 1963–1968 (2017). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources