Wearable cardioverter defibrillator after ICD-system explantation: data from a multicenter registry
- PMID: 40025101
- PMCID: PMC11873030
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-91046-4
Wearable cardioverter defibrillator after ICD-system explantation: data from a multicenter registry
Abstract
Data on the use of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) among patients after cardiac implantable electronic device explantation of 1- to 3-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems (ICD) are sparse. Accordingly, several guidelines give a different recommendation regarding WCD indication in this cohort. We aimed to study the baseline characteristics and outcome of patients treated with WCD after ICD explantation. The primary outcome is appropriate WCD shock. Within a multicenter registry 109 patients received a WCD to bridge the time after ICD-system explantation until reimplantation due to a persistent ICD-indication. The mean follow-up was 824 ± 773 days. In addition to ventricular tachyarrhythmias and/or WCD shocks during WCD wear time, also the rate of rehospitalization for ventricular tachyarrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, stroke and congestive heart failure after ICD-reimplantation was evaluated. Patients had a mean age of 65 ± 14 years, and were hospitalized for 21 ± 15 days. The index left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was at baseline 35.7 ± 14.1% and 35.7 ± 14.2% at short-term follow-up. Mean wear time of the WCD was 61 ± 46 days after ICD-system explantation. During that time an appropriate WCD shock was documented in 7.3% of patients. Up to 80.6% of patients after ICD-system explantation were re-implanted. The rates of rehospitalization due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias, heart failure and atrial fibrillation were 7.3%, 6.8% and 4.1%, respectively. After ICD-reimplantation the rate of appropriate shocks was 12/89 (13.4%). Occurrence of malignant ventricular tachyarrythmia after ICD-system explantation is high and the use of WCD among these patients could be beneficial in preventing sudden cardiac death.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
A review of the evidence on the effects and costs of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in different patient groups, and modelling of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility for these groups in a UK context.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(27):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-164. doi: 10.3310/hta10270. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16904046
-
First human safety and effectiveness study of defibrillation with a novel patch wearable cardioverter-defibrillator.Europace. 2024 Jul 2;26(7):euae189. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae189. Europace. 2024. PMID: 39001864 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Benefit of the Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Protecting Patients After Implantable-Cardioverter Defibrillator Explant: Results From the National Registry.JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Mar;3(3):243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Nov 23. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017. PMID: 29759518
-
Performance and Safety of the Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Through Long-Term Follow-Up: Final Results From the Pivotal Study.Circulation. 2025 Jan 28;151(4):322-332. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.071795. Epub 2024 Sep 26. Circulation. 2025. PMID: 39327797 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Oct;4(10):772-779. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 Jul 6. JACC Heart Fail. 2016. PMID: 27395347
References
-
- Huikuri, H. V., Castellanos, A. & Myerburg, R. J. Sudden death due to cardiac arrhythmias. N Engl. J. Med.345, 1473–1482. 10.1056/NEJMra000650 (2001). - PubMed
-
- Baddour, L. M. et al. A summary of the update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American heart association. J. Am. Dent. Assoc.142, 159–165. 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0058 (2011). - PubMed
-
- Shah, M. J. et al. 2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients. Cardiol. Young. 31, 1738–1769. 10.1017/S1047951121003413 (2021). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical