Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2025 Feb 10:59:102984.
doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2025.102984. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Minimally invasive management of urinary fistula following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Case report

Affiliations
Case Reports

Minimally invasive management of urinary fistula following robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Case report

Emanuele Cappa et al. Urol Case Rep. .

Abstract

Urinary fistulas are a known complication that can occur after partial nephrectomy, potentially causing considerable morbidity if not properly treated. The present study examines the case of a 71-year-old male patient who developed a urinary fistula six months following a robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Initial efforts to address the fistula through the placement of a double pigtail ureteral stent proved ineffective. Subsequent interventional radiology procedures successfully achieved fistula closure by administering adhesive fibrin directly within the fistulous tract. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in handling post-surgical complications like urinary fistulas.

Keywords: Minimally invasive; Robot-assisted radical nephrectomy; Urinary fistula.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(a, b, c) depicts CT Urography conducted during hospital readmission. Notably, contrast leakage is observed at the upper pole of the left kidney, extending both upward (b) and posteriorly behind the kidney (c).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(a,b) The left kidney exhibits a double pigtail (arrow) in the pelvis, with a guidewire inserted from the lower pole via percutaneous access (asterisk), terminating in the upper pole. Additionally, there is abdominal drainage (arrow head) with a pigtail drainage at the site of urinoma collection. Contrast leakage from the upper pole is observed (star), leading to fistula formation and collection (a).Following the application of adhesive fibrin using a vascular catheter through the fistula, there was an instantaneous cessation of contrast leakage within the fistula (b).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Final pyelography after removing double pigtail ureteral stent one month after nephrostomy removal confirmed the sustained absence of the urinary fistula.

References

    1. Guliev B.G. Urinary fistulas after partial nephrectomy in renal cell carcinoma. Urology Herald. 2021;9(2):111–124. doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-2-111-124. - DOI
    1. Kowalewski K.F., Müller D., Kirchner M., et al. Robotic-assisted versus conventional open partial nephrectomy (robocop): a propensity score-matched analysis of 249 patients. Urol Int. 2021;105(5-6):490–498. doi: 10.1159/000513189. Epub 2021 Mar 11. PMID: 33706322. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Potretzke A.M., Knight B.A., Zargar H., et al. Urinary fistula after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre analysis of 1 791 patients. BJU Int. 2016 Jan;117(1):131–137. doi: 10.1111/bju.13249. Epub 2015 Sep 6. PMID: 26235802. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kundu S.D., Thompson R.H., Kallingal G.J., Cambareri G., Russo P. Urinary fistulae after partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2010 Oct;106(7):1042–1044. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09230.x. Epub 2010 Mar 4. PMID: 20230384; PMCID: PMC4318244. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tachibana H., Takagi T., Kondo T., Ishida H., Tanabe K. Comparison of perioperative outcomes with or without renorrhaphy during open partial nephrectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Int Braz J Urol. 2018 May-Jun;44(3):467–474. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0581. PMID: 29244272; PMCID: PMC5996815. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources