Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 11;10(7):7256-7263.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c10879. eCollection 2025 Feb 25.

Ultrasensitive Assays Detect Different Conformations of Plasma β Amyloids

Affiliations

Ultrasensitive Assays Detect Different Conformations of Plasma β Amyloids

Chia-Yu Li et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

With the developments of ultrasensitive technologies such as immunomagnetic reduction (IMR) assay, single molecule array (SIMOA) assay, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), the assay of blood-based amyloid 1-42 (Aβ1-42) becomes possible. However, the changes in measured plasma Aβ1-42 concentrations in Alzheimer's disease (AD) compared to cognitively unimpaired subjects (CU) are inconsistent. A possible reason for the inconsistency regarding various conformations of Aβ1-42 in plasma is explored in this study. Three samples with equal amounts of Aβ1-42 but different proportions of monomers and oligomers of Aβ1-42 were prepared. The Aβ1-42 composition of monomers and oligomers in samples was analyzed with Western blot. Identically diluted versions of these three samples were assayed with IMR and SIMOA for Aβ1-42 concentrations. The three diluted samples showed similar levels of Aβ1-42 assayed with IMR, whereas much lower levels for samples with more oligomers assayed with SIOMA. The results imply that IMR detects both monomers and oligomers of Aβ1-42. The measured levels of Aβ1-42 are independent of the proportions of monomer or oligomer Aβ1-42 but depend on the total amounts of Aβ1-42. In the case of SIMOA, monomers of Aβ1-42 are the primary target measured. By comparing Aβ1-42 concentrations of the plasma using IMR and SIMOA, the significant difference in plasma Aβ1-42 levels using IMR in AD compared to CU is mainly due to the formations of oligomeric Aβ1-42. Therefore, if the target molecules are monomers of Aβ1-42, SIMOA is the method of choice. Still, if the target molecules should include monomers, small and large oligomers, IMR would be an optimal consideration. In the future, the clinical implications of the proportion of oligomeric Aβ1-42 need to be elucidated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Detection of Aβ1–42 monomer-rich and synthetic Aβ1–42 oligomer-rich samples were detected by Western blotting. Lane 1: Aβ1–42 monomer-rich sample (Sample 1); Lanes 2 and 3: Aβ1–42 oligomer-rich samples (Samples 2, 3).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Measured Aβ1–42 concentrations in d-Samples 1, 2, and 3 using IMR and SIMOA assays.
Figure 3
Figure 3
No significant correlation of plasma Aβ1–42 concentrations between IMR and SIMOA measurements.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Schematic diagram shows how magnetic nanoparticles bind to monomers and oligomers in an immunomagnetic reduction assay. The magnetic particle binds to a monomer is smaller in size and lower in mass, thus having a higher spin velocity during oscillation. The magnetic particle binds to an oligomer is larger in size and higher in mass, consequently having a lower spin velocity during oscillation. The IMR analyzer applies an alternative current magnetic field to induce oscillation of all magnetic particles in the solution.

Similar articles

References

    1. Coria F.; Castaño E. M.; Frangione B. Brain amyloid in normal aging and cerebral amyloid angiopathy is antigenically related to Alzheimer’s disease beta-protein. Am. J. Pathol. 1987, 129 (3), 422–428. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coria F.; Prelli F.; Castaño E. M.; Larrondo-Lillo M.; Fernandez-Gonzalez J.; van Duinen S. G.; Bots G. T.; Luyendijk W.; Shelanski M. L.; Frangione B. Beta-protein deposition: a pathogenetic link between Alzheimer’s disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathies. Brain Res. 1988, 463 (1), 187–191. 10.1016/0006-8993(88)90545-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Engler H.; Forsberg A.; Almkvist O.; Blomquist G.; Larsson E.; Savitcheva I.; Wall A.; Ringheim A.; Långström B.; Nordberg A. Two-year follow-up of amyloid deposition in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2006, 129 (11), 2856–2866. 10.1093/brain/awl178. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fan L. Y.; Tzen K. Y.; Chen Y. F.; Chen T. F.; Lai Y. M.; Yen R. F.; Huang Y. Y.; Shiue C. Y.; Yang S. Y.; Chiu M. J. The relation between brain amyloid deposition, cortical atrophy, and plasma biomarkers in amnesic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2018, 10, 17510.3389/fnagi.2018.00175. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hampel H.; Hardy J.; Blennow K.; Chen C.; Perry G.; Kim S. H.; Villemagne V. L.; Aisen P.; Vendruscolo M.; Iwatsubo T.; Masters C. L.; Cho M.; Lannfelt L.; Cummings J. L.; Vergallo A. The amyloid-β pathway in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Psychiatry 2021, 26 (10), 5481–5503. 10.1038/s41380-021-01249-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources