Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 14:16:1532605.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1532605. eCollection 2025.

Clinical significance of the tumor microenvironment on immune tolerance in gastric cancer

Affiliations
Review

Clinical significance of the tumor microenvironment on immune tolerance in gastric cancer

Xiangyang He et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

In the realm of oncology, the tumor microenvironment (TME)-comprising extracellular matrix components, immune cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells-plays a pivotal role in tumorigenesis, progression, and response to therapeutic interventions. Initially, the TME exhibits tumor-suppressive properties that can inhibit malignant transformation. However, as the tumor progresses, various factors induce immune tolerance, resulting in TME behaving in a state that promotes tumor growth and metastasis in later stages. This state of immunosuppression is crucial as it enables TME to change from a role of killing tumor cells to a role of promoting tumor progression. Gastric cancer is a common malignant tumor of the gastrointestinal tract with an alarmingly high mortality rate. While chemotherapy has historically been the cornerstone of treatment, its efficacy in prolonging survival remains limited. The emergence of immunotherapy has opened new therapeutic pathways, yet the challenge of immune tolerance driven by the gastric cancer microenvironment complicates these efforts. This review aims to elucidate the intricate role of the TME in mediating immune tolerance in gastric cancer and to spotlight innovative strategies and clinical trials designed to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapeutic approaches. By providing a comprehensive theoretical framework, this review seeks to advance the understanding and application of immunotherapy in the treatment of gastric cancer, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes.

Keywords: gastric cancer; immunosuppression; immunotherapy; metabolize; tumor microenvironment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Immune cells exert diverse effects on GC cells in the TME. In the TME of GC, immune cells such as neutrophils, macrophages, dendritic cells, Tregs and CD8+ T cells, interact with cancer cells in complex ways. Neutrophils can be polarized into N1 (tumor-suppressive) and N2 (tumor-promoting) phenotypes; Macrophages can differentiate into M1 (anti-tumor) and M2 (pro-tumor) subtypes, influenced by factors like PTX3 and HMGA1B/2. M2 macrophages and Tregs facilitate cancer progression by dampening immune responses. Additionally, prostaglandin E2, IL-10, and TGF-β inhibit the cytotoxic activity of NK cells. Although CD8+ T cells produce IFN-γ and TNF-α for their cytotoxic functions, their activity is inhibited by TGF-β. Dendritic cells play a role in activating CD8+ T cells, but their function is compromised by the presence of LAG-3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Development of immunosuppressive TME through various mechanisms. As the tumor progresses, an immunosuppressive TME is established through a variety of mechanisms, including glycolytic metabolism, glutamine metabolism, lipid metabolism, cytokine activity, and noncoding RNAs. (blue arrows indicate inhibition, red arrows indicate induction, and yellow arrows indicate promotion.).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Biondi A, Persiani R, Cananzi F, Zoccali M, Vigorita V, Tufo A, et al. . R0 resection in the treatment of gastric cancer: room for improvement. World J Gastroenterol. (2010) 16:3358–70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i27.3358 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F, et al. . Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med. (2008) 358:36–46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073149 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Park JS, Lim JY, Park SK, Kim MK, Ko HS, Yoon SO, et al. . Prognostic factors of second and third line chemotherapy using 5-fu with platinum, irinotecan, and taxane for advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Res Treat. (2011) 43:236–43. doi: 10.4143/crt.2011.43.4.236 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. . Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. (2010) 376:687–97. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources