Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec;14(1):2474114.
doi: 10.1080/21623945.2025.2474114. Epub 2025 Mar 3.

miR-6402 targets Bmpr2 and negatively regulates mouse adipogenesis

Affiliations

miR-6402 targets Bmpr2 and negatively regulates mouse adipogenesis

Malaz Elsheikh et al. Adipocyte. 2025 Dec.

Abstract

Obesity is characterized by macrophage infiltration into adipose tissue. White adipose tissue remodelling under inflammatory conditions involves both hypertrophy and adipogenesis and is regulated by transcription factors, which are influenced by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signalling. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate gene expression and are involved in obesity-related processes such as adipogenesis. Therefore, we identified differentially expressed miRNAs in the epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT) of mice fed a normal diet (ND) and those fed a high-fat diet (HFD). The expression of miR-6402 was significantly suppressed in the inflamed eWAT of HFD-fed mice than in ND-fed mice. Furthermore, Bmpr2, the receptor for BMP4, was identified as a target gene of miR-6402. Consistently, miR-6402 was downregulated in the inflamed eWAT of HFD-fed mice and in 3T3-L1 cells (preadipocytes) and differentiated 3T3-L1 cells (mature adipocytes) , and BMPR2 expression in these cells was upregulated. Adipogenesis was induced in WAT by BMP4 injection (in vivo) and in 3T3-L1 cells by BMP4 stimulation (in vitro), both of which were inhibited by miR-6402 transfection. Inflamed eWAT showed higher expression of BMPR2 and the adipogenesis markers C/EBPβ and PPARγ, which was suppressed by miR-6402 transfection. Our findings suggest that miR-6402 is a novel anti-adipogenic miRNA that combats obesity by inhibiting the BMP4/BMPR2 signalling pathway and subsequently reducing adipose tissue expansion.

Keywords: Adipocyte; adipogenesis; bone morphogenetic protein receptor type 2; miR-6402; microRNA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Figures

(a) In a heatmap of 18 microRNAs from ND- and HFD-fed WATs using microarray analysis, miR-6402 was ranked fourth in the heatmap sorted by the lowest expression level in HFD-fed WATs. (b) miR-6402 expression was downregulated in the WATs of HFD. (c) The expression of miR-6402 was downregulated in co-culture of differentiated 3T3-L1 cells and RAW264.7 macrophages enriched LPS media. (d) miR-6402 expression was no changed in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages. (e,f) miR-6402 expression was significantly suppressed in 3T3-L1 and differentiated 3T3-L1 cells that were stimulated with TNF-α.
Figure 1.
miR-6402 is suppressed in the obese mouse adipose tissues and tnf-α-stimulated adipocytes. (a) Heatmap of downregulated miRNAs in eWAT after HFD feeding in comparison with the findings in nd-fed mice. (b–f) qPCR analyses were performed to assess miR-6402 expression in eWAT (b), differentiated 3T3-L1 cells co-cultured with RAW264.7 cells (c), or RAW264.7 cells (d) stimulated with LPS for the indicated times, and undifferentiated (e) or differentiated (f) 3T3-L1 cells stimulated with tnf-α (5 ng/mL) for 4 h. The bar graphs represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 3 for each group). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 between the indicated bars of the two groups (b, e, and f; Student’s t-test; c and d, Tukey – Kramer HSD test).
(a) Of the 15 predicted genes, only Bmpr2 gene expression was downregulated in 3T3-L1 cells. (b) BMPR2 protein expression was downregulated in 3T3-L1 after the transfection. (c) Bmpr2 gene expression was downregulated in differentiated 3T3-L1 cells. (d) BMPR2 protein expression was downregulated in differentiated 3T3-L1 after the transfection. (e) Bmpr2 gene expression was upregulated in 3T3-L1 after TNF-α stimulation. (f) BMPR2 protein expression was upregulated in 3T3-L1 after TNF-α stimulation for 4 and 6 h. (g) Bmpr2 gene expression was upregulated in differentiated 3T3-L1 after TNF-α stimulation. (h) BMPR2 protein expression was upregulated in differentiated 3T3-L1 after TNF-α stimulation for 4 and 6 h.
Figure 2.
Bmpr2 is the target of miR-6402 and is upregulated in inflamed adipocytes. Undifferentiated (a and b) and differentiated (c and d) 3T3-L1 cells were transfected with negative control microRNA (control) or miR-6402 mimics for 24 h. Significant expression of miR-6402 was observed in undifferentiated and differentiated 3T3-L1 cells (supplementary fig. S3a and b), indicating successful transfection of miR-6402. Expression of the indicated potential miR-6402 target genes predicted by TargetScan was measured by qPCR (a). BMPR2 expression in undifferentiated 3T3-L1 cells transfected with control and miR-6402 mimics was analysed by western blotting (b), BMPR2 expression in differentiated 3T3-L1 cells transfected with control and miR-6402 mimics was analysed by qPCR (c) and western blotting (d). BMPR2 expression was measured by qPCR (e and g) and western blotting (f and h) using undifferentiated (e and f) or differentiated (g and h) 3T3-L1 cells stimulated with tnf-α (5 ng/mL). β-actin was used as the loading control. Original whole-membrane and repeated images are shown in supplementary fig. S4, S5, S6 and S7. The bar graphs represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 3–4 for each group). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 between the indicated bars of the two groups (a – e and g, Student’s t-test; f and h, Tukey – Kramer HSD test).
(a) In all groups, Oil Red O staining became stronger in the order of days 0, 3, and 6, but on days 3 and 6, staining was strongest in the BMP4 stimulation group, and the intensity was reduced in the miR-6402-transfected group. (b,c) Bmpr2, C/ebpβ, and Pparγ gene expression was upregulated in eWATs of HFD-fed mice. (d) C/EBPβ and PPARγ protein expression was upregulated in eWATs of HFD-fed mice.
Figure 3.
miR-6402 inhibits BMP4-induced adipogenesis. (a) Oil red O staining on day 0, 3, and 6. 3T3-L1 cells were cultured to 50–70% confluence and transfected with miR-6402 mimic. After 24 h, the cells were stimulated with a combination of differentiation media in the presence or absence of BMP4 (10 ng/mL). Scale bar: 100 µm. (b – d) expression of BMPR2, C/EBPβ, and PPARγ by qPCR (b and c) or western blotting (d) in eWAT from ND- or hfd-fed mice. Original whole-membrane images of (d) are shown in supplementary fig. S8. β-actin was used as the loading control. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3–4 for each group). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 (Student’s t-test).
Staining images of BMPR2 and HE staining of eWATs were shown. (b) BMPR2 staining intensity was suppressed in miR-6402 transfected group. (c,d) Adipocytes of small size were increased in BMP4 injected group, while adipocytes of size in miR-6402 injected group were almost normal. (e) BMPR2, C/EBPβ, and PPARγ protein expression was suppressed in miR-6402 injected eWATs.
Figure 4.
miR-6402 inhibits BMP4-induced adipogenesis in vivo. (a–e) BMP4 was injected into eWAT together with control or miR-6402 mimic. Two out of the seven mice were used for immunohistochemical staining of BMPR2 and hematoxylin-eosin staining (a; mouse No. 1 and 2), and the other five mice were used for analysis of BMPR2, C/EBPβ, and PPARγ expression by western blotting (e; mouse No. 3–7). Four different images from mice 1 and 2 (i.e. 8 images from two mouse eWAT samples) were obtained and analyzed for the immunohistochemical staining intensity of BMPR2 (b), frequency and mean cell size of adipocytes (c), and number of adipocytes (d). Representative image sets are shown in (a). Scale bar; 100 µm. Other images are shown in supplementary fig. S10. Western blotting results are shown on the far left in (e), and these analyzed data are shown as three bar graphs on the right. β-actin was used as a loading control. Original whole-membrane images are shown in supplementary fig. S11. The bar graphs represent the mean ± S.D. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 between the indicated bar of two groups (Student’s t-test).

References

    1. Jakab J, Miškić B, Mikšić Š, et al. Adipogenesis as a potential anti-obesity target: a review of pharmacological treatment and natural products. Diabetes, Metab Syndr Obes. 2021;14:67–11. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S281186 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:13–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sethi JK, Hotamisligil GS.. Metabolic messengers: tumour necrosis factor. Nat Metab. 2021;3(10):1302–1312. doi: 10.1038/s42255-021-00470-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Porro S, Genchi VA, Cignarelli A, et al. Dysmetabolic adipose tissue in obesity: morphological and functional characteristics of adipose stem cells and mature adipocytes in healthy and unhealthy obese subjects. J Endocrinol Invest. 2021;44(5):921–941. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01446-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ali AT, Hochfeld WE, Myburgh R, et al. Adipocyte and adipogenesis. Eur J Cell Biol. 2013;92(6–7):229–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2013.06.001 - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources