Survival and Readmission Burden in Advanced Heart Failure Patients Managed With Ventricular Assist Device Versus Continued Medical Therapy
- PMID: 40028781
- DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002382
Survival and Readmission Burden in Advanced Heart Failure Patients Managed With Ventricular Assist Device Versus Continued Medical Therapy
Abstract
As questions remain about the risk-benefit of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy, we evaluated the association between LVAD versus medical therapy for the competing risk of all-cause mortality and all-cause readmission. Among consecutive patients evaluated for advanced heart failure (HF) therapy, 260 were referred for LVAD implantation and 292 continued medical therapy in this retrospective, observational database study. At 2 years, all-cause mortality was significantly higher among medically managed patients versus LVAD recipients (37% vs. 25%, p = 0.014). Separation in event rates appeared within 3 months and was sustained throughout follow-up. The cumulative incidence rate of all-cause readmissions at 2 years was higher among LVAD recipients (78% vs. 40%, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, compared with medical therapy, LVAD therapy was associated with a significant 35% lower risk of death ( p = 0.005), driven by a 57% reduction in the risk of death within the first 3 months ( p < 0.001), and a 2.8-fold increased risk of readmission. Among medically managed patients, lower baseline hemoglobin and blood pressure, older age, and increased creatinine were predictors of death. In conclusion, among patients with advanced HF, LVAD therapy was associated with pronounced survival benefit, but a higher 2-year readmission rate compared with medical management.
Keywords: advanced heart failure; left ventricular assist device; readmission.
Copyright © ASAIO 2025.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: J.D.A. reports a relationship with Abbott that includes funding grants. I.G., K.W., and L.C. report a relationship with Abbott that includes consulting or advisory. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
References
-
- Bozkurt B, Ahmad T, Alexander KM, et al.; Writing Committee Members: Heart failure epidemiology and outcomes statistics: A report of the Heart Failure Society of America. J Card Fail 29: 1412–1451, 2023.
-
- Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al.; ACC/AHA Joint Committee Members: 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 145: e895–e1032, 2022.
-
- Ambardekar AV, Kittleson MM, Palardy M, et al.: Outcomes with ambulatory advanced heart failure from the Medical Arm of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (MedaMACS) registry. J Heart Lung Transplant 38: 408–417, 2019.
-
- Estep JD, Starling RC, Horstmanshof DA, et al.; ROADMAP Study Investigators: Risk assessment and comparative effectiveness of left ventricular assist device and medical management in ambulatory heart failure patients: Results from the ROADMAP study. J Am Coll Cardiol 66: 1747–1761, 2015.
-
- Rose EA, Gelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, et al.; Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure (REMATCH) Study Group: Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med 345: 1435–1443, 2001.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
