Mechanical Power in Pressure-Controlled Ventilation: A Simple and Reliable Bedside Method
- PMID: 40028908
- PMCID: PMC11878992
- DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001224
Mechanical Power in Pressure-Controlled Ventilation: A Simple and Reliable Bedside Method
Abstract
Background: Mechanical power (MP) represents the amount of energy applied by the ventilator to the respiratory system over time. There are two main methods to calculate MP in mechanical ventilation. The first is the geometric method, which directly measures the dynamic inspiratory area of the pressure-volume loop during the respiratory cycle. The second involves using various algebraic equations to estimate MP. However, almost all calculations are either complex or not reliable compared with the geometric method, considered the gold standard. This study aimed to develop an easy to use, reliable equation for bedside calculation of MP and to compare its accuracy with other existing equations for calculating MP.
Methods: In a preliminary study, we measured MP in 56 cases who were mechanically ventilated and without spontaneous breathing efforts. The measurements were done at the ICU of a single university medical center in the Netherlands.
Results: We found that the MP can be accurately calculated using an equation that incorporates the plateau pressure in 56 cases in 42 patients. The MP estimated with our new proposed equation (MP calculated using plateau pressure) correlated well with the reference value of MP with a bias of 0.2 J/min. The 95% limits of agreement (LoAs) were -3.1 to + 3.4 J/min. Other equations give the following bias and LoAs; bias of -0.8, LoA -3.8 to 1.9 J/min (van der Meijden equation), bias of -1.9, LoA -3.7 to -0.0 J/min (comprehensive Becher equation), bias of -2.4, LoA -4.5 to -0.3 J/min (simplified Becher equation), and a bias of -1.9, LoA -3.7 to 0.1 J/min (linear model equation).
Conclusions: The equation we propose to calculate MP in pressure-controlled ventilation is a reliable, simple, and accurate alternative for the previously published equations. Consequently, this method is highly suitable for routine use in clinical practice.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
Mr. Snoep, Ms. Rietveld, Dr. van der Velde-Quist, and Dr. Schoe were invited to speak at workshops organized by Hamilton Medical AG. The invited experts had their lodging expenses covered, while participants from abroad were reimbursed for their travel costs. Dr. de Jonge has disclosed that he does not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM: Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:2126–2136 - PubMed
-
- Silva PL, Negrini D, MacÊdo Rocco PR: Mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury in healthy lungs. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2015; 29:301–313 - PubMed
-
- Serpa Neto A, Deliberato RO, Johnson AEW, et al. ; PROVE Network Investigators: Mechanical power of ventilation is associated with mortality in critically ill patients: An analysis of patients in two observational cohorts. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44:1914–1922 - PubMed
-
- Cressoni M, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, et al. : Mechanical power and development of ventilator-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology 2016; 124:736–737 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
