Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025;122(3):366-375.
doi: 10.1159/000544811. Epub 2025 Mar 3.

Electrical Impedance Tomography during the Extubation Phase in Very Preterm Born Infants

Affiliations
Observational Study

Electrical Impedance Tomography during the Extubation Phase in Very Preterm Born Infants

Jantine J Wisse et al. Neonatology. 2025.

Abstract

Introduction: Although many preterm born infants require invasive mechanical ventilation, it is also associated with detrimental effects. Early extubation should be pursued, but extubation failure is yet common. The critical transition to noninvasive ventilation is characterized by respiratory physiological changes, warranting noninvasive monitoring. We aimed to determine whether electrical impedance tomography (EIT) could provide insights into the respiratory mechanics of neonates around extubation, and if findings were different between successful and failed extubation.

Methods: Single-center observational study where EIT and transcutaneous CO2 measurements were performed in preterm born infants <32 weeks gestational age. Measurements were performed from 24 h before up to 48 h after extubation. EIT parameters extracted from the hour before and after extubation were analyzed to evaluate the short-term physiological changes.

Results: Twenty-one patients were included and 6 (29%) were reintubated. End-expiratory lung impedance and tidal impedance variation were stable around extubation (p = 0.86 and p = 0.47, respectively). Compared to successfully extubated patients, reintubated patients showed more lung inhomogeneity (GI index) after extubation (0.75 vs. 0.84, p = 0.03). The percentage of nondependent silent spaces decreased after extubation in successfully extubated patients (p < 0.001). Body position and ventilator mode influenced these findings.

Conclusion: EIT measurements in preterm neonates provide valuable insight into the respiratory physiology during the transition from invasive to noninvasive ventilation, with significant differences in ventilation distribution and lung homogeneity between successfully extubated and reintubated patients. EIT has the potential to guide personalized respiratory support by assessing ventilation distribution and quantifying inhomogeneity, aiding in the optimization of ventilation settings.

Keywords: Electrical impedance tomography; Extubation; Preterm neonate; Ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All declared interests are not related to the submitted work. A.H.J. has received research funding (paid to the institution) from ZonMw, Pulmotech B.V., Liberate Medical, the Netherlands eScience center and Health∼Holland. H.E. has received unrestricted research grants from ZonMW (The Netherlands), Fisher and Paykel Healthcare (Auckland, New Zealand), Roche Diagnostics International Ltd. (Basel, Switzerland), and Ventinova Medical B.V. (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) and speakers’ fee from Getinge (Sweden). The remaining authors declare that they have no relevant competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Global impedance signal of a patient on SIMV ventilation before extubation and CPAP after extubation. The horizontal line indicates the moment of extubation. Breath A: supported breath by mechanical ventilation with homogeneous ventilation over all lung field. Breath B: unsupported spontaneous breath during SIMV, with decreased ventilation in the right ventral lung. Breath C: spontaneous breathing after extubation during CPAP, with a similar ventilation pattern as breath B. This patient required reintubation due to stridor and dyspnea.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
a EELI level before and after extubation. b dZ before and after extubation. c MVEIT before and after extubation. d GI before and after extubation. e NSS before and after extubation. f DSS before and after extubation. The group with successfully extubated patients is colored green, the group with reintubated patients is colored red. Significant differences from baseline within a group are indicated with a green star for patients with successful extubation and with a red star for reintubated patients. Significant difference at a time point between the groups is indicated with a horizontal bar. p values in the figures are for interaction effect of group by measurement step.

References

    1. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Walsh MC, Carlo WA, Shankaran S, et al. . Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993–2012. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1039–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Venkatesh V, Ponnusamy V, Anandaraj J, Chaudhary R, Malviya M, Clarke P, et al. . Endotracheal intubation in a neonatal population remains associated with a high risk of adverse events. Eur J Pediatr. 2011;170(2):223–7. - PubMed
    1. Sangsari R, Saeedi M, Maddah M, Mirnia K, Goldsmith JP. Weaning and extubation from neonatal mechanical ventilation: an evidenced-based review. BMC Pulm Med. 2022;22(1):421. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sant’Anna GM, Keszler M. Weaning infants from mechanical ventilation. Clin Perinatol. 2012;39(3):543–62. - PubMed
    1. Manley BJ, Doyle LW, Owen LS, Davis PG. Extubating extremely preterm infants: predictors of success and outcomes following failure. J Pediatr. 2016;173:45–9. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources