Reasons for emergency department use of low-acuity attender: results from the prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional EPICS-9/PiNo-Bund study
- PMID: 40032406
- PMCID: PMC11877155
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090681
Reasons for emergency department use of low-acuity attender: results from the prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional EPICS-9/PiNo-Bund study
Abstract
Background: The number of low-acuity emergency department (ED) visits varies across Europe and is often posited as a contributing factor to ED crowding. Many health policy-makers and health professionals assume that these cases are 'avoidable' ED visits or could be referred to other ambulatory healthcare providers.
Objectives: This study examines the care-seeking behaviour and the reasoning behind patients with low-acuity ED attendance according to emergency triage.
Design and setting: In a prospective multicentre cross-sectional survey, patients were invited to participate in an anonymised, paper-based survey in the waiting areas of nine EDs in Germany (2018-2020). The survey included questions on sociodemographic characteristics, reasons for using the ED, previous consultations in the outpatient healthcare system, self-rated urgency and knowledge of other emergency care structures. Due to the variance of missing values in the different responses, the valid percentages are shown.
Results: Of the 2752 survey respondents, 41.1% (n=1 120) indicated that 'pain' was the primary complaint for their ED attendance. Self-rated urgency was 'less urgent' for 58.7% (n=1552), 'urgent' for 41.3% (n=1093) and 57.7% reported the first episode of their symptoms (n=1505), with 30.8% (n=830) with symptom onset on the same day. The majority of patients completed the survey on weekdays (94.6%) between 08:00 and 18:00 (82.2%). 80.1% stated that they had a general practitioner (GP) (n=2103) and 55.8% contacted their GP before attending the ED (n=1403). In 77.8% of patients with GP contact, a visit to the ED was recommended by practice members or the GP (n=1068). The on-call service of the statutory health insurance physicians (SHIP) was contacted by 7.0% (n=172); in 64.6% of these cases (n=115), an ED visit was recommended. Of all patients without contact to the SHIP on-call service, 60.6% stated that they were not aware of these services (n=848).
Conclusions: Patients with low-acuity ED attendance stated acute onset and mainly new episodes of symptoms, with pain being the most common chief complaint. A high proportion reported having contacted their GP or SHIP on-call services (if known) but have been referred to the ED. As long as no fundamental changes are made to the provision of timely treatment options in the outpatient care sector, EDs may continue to be the foremost treatment option for these patients.
Keywords: ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; Emergency Departments; Health Services; Health Services Accessibility; Quality in health care.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD002097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002097.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 13;2:CD002097. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002097.pub4. PMID: 23152213 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
-
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35802350 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Blümel M, Spranger A, Achstetter K, et al. Germany: Health System Review. Health Syst Transit. 2020;22:1–272. - PubMed
-
- Regierungskommission für eine modernde und bedarfsgerechte Krankenhausversorgung Neunte Stellungnahme und Empfehlung der Regierungskommission für eine moderne und bedarfsgerechte Krankenhausversorgung Reform der Notfall- und Akutversorgung: Rettungsdienst und Finanzierung. 2023.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous