Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;75(5):1155-1167.
doi: 10.1007/s00267-025-02132-2. Epub 2025 Mar 3.

Characterizing governance models for upscaling wetland restoration

Affiliations

Characterizing governance models for upscaling wetland restoration

Arnaud Terrisse et al. Environ Manage. 2025 May.

Abstract

Governance is a key element for effective conservation, sustainable management and restoration of ecosystems. Improving governance is essential for upscaling restoration actions around the world. Governance systems were studied in eleven on-going European wetland restoration sites using a two-step process. First, an in-depth examination of seven sites from six countries was made using key informant interviews. This information provided the basis for developing four governance models (Monocentric, Polycentric, Community-based and Networking). Most of the sites presented a dominant governance model, but also incorporated some dimensions of the other models to a lesser degree. The models were tested and evaluated in an additional seven sites in five countries. The analysis revealed that the governance models were highly subject to the geographical features, land ownership structures and different histories of the sites. Strengths, weaknesses, and supporting and limiting factors were associated with each model. This research shows how governance models are adapted to site specific conditions and how these adaptations can be used to enhance governance processes in existing sites, upscale restoration efforts or set the groundwork in new restoration sites.

Keywords: Ecological restoration; Governance models; Upscaling; Wetlands.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Four theoretical governance models identified among restoration sites in Europe
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Map of knowledge and action sites involved in the WaterLANDS project
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
WaterLANDS pillars and their relationship with the IUCN’s governance principles
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Supporting factors for ecological restoration ranked according to importance
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Limiting factors for ecological restoration ranked according to importance

References

    1. Albert C, Brillinger M, Guerrero P et al. (2021) Planning nature-based solutions: Principles, steps, and insights. Ambio 50:1446–1461. 10.1007/s13280-020-01365-1 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aggestam F (2013) Wetland Restoration and the Involvement of Stakeholders: An Analysis Based on Value-Perspectives. Landsc Res 39(6):680–697. 10.1080/01426397.2013.819076
    1. Alexander SM, Andrachuk M, Armitage D (2016) Navigating governance networks for community‐based conservation. Front Ecol Environ 14:155–164. 10.1002/fee.1251
    1. Andersson KP, Ostrom E (2008) Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sci 41:71–93. 10.1007/s11077-007-9055-6
    1. Asley H, Kenton N, Milligan A (2008) Participatory learning and action: Issue 58, Towards Empowered Participation: stories and reflection. International Institute for Environment and Development, London

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources