Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;14(3):657-669.
doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01117-2. Epub 2025 Mar 4.

Cefiderocol for the Treatment of Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections Caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A Case Series and Literature Review

Collaborators, Affiliations

Cefiderocol for the Treatment of Nosocomial Bloodstream Infections Caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A Case Series and Literature Review

Antonio Vena et al. Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: The treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infections (BSI) remains challenging due to the organism's intrinsic multidrug resistance and the potential side effects of commonly used first-line antibiotics.

Methods: Here, we describe four cases of S. maltophilia BSI treated with cefiderocol (≥ 72 h) in different Italian hospitals. Additionally, we conducted a PubMed search to identify other studies reporting cases of S. maltophilia BSI managed with cefiderocol.

Results: We reviewed a total of 8 cases of S. maltophilia BSI [median age 52.5 years (Q1-Q3 27.5-61.0), 50% males] treated with cefiderocol, including ours. BSI sources were mainly central venous catheters (62.5%) and the lower respiratory tract (25.0%). Cefiderocol was used as first-line therapy in 87.5% of patients (7/8), with a median treatment duration of 14 days (IQR 6.2-16.0). Combination therapy was administered in 62.5% of cases. Infection source control was required in 75.0% and achieved in 40.0%. Clinical success was observed in 62.5% of patients, with microbiological eradication in 87.5%. In-hospital mortality occurred in 37.5% of cases, with one death directly attributable to S. maltophilia. No significant differences were observed in terms of outcomes between cefiderocol monotherapy and combination therapy.

Conclusions: Based on our findings and a review of the literature, cefiderocol-based regimens show promise as an effective treatment option for S. maltophilia BSI, warranting further investigation in larger studies.

Keywords: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia; Bloodstream infections; Cefiderocol; Multidrug resistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Outside the submitted work, Antonio Vena reports research grants and/or personal fees for advisor/consultant and/or speaker/chairman from Gilead, Menarini, MSD, Pfizer, Astella and Shionogi. Outside the submitted work, Matteo Bassetti reports research grants and/or personal fees for advisor/consultant and/or speaker/chairman from BioMérieux, Cidara, Gilead, Menarini, MSD, Pfizer and Shionogi. Outside the submitted work, Daniele Roberto Giacobbe reports investigator-initiated grants from Pfizer Inc., Shionogi, BioMérieux and Gilead Italia, and personal fees for advisor/speaker from Pfizer Inc., Menarini and Tillotts Pharma. Laura Mezzogori, Nadia Castaldo, Silvia Corcione, Renato Pascale, Maddalena Giannella, Simone Mornese Pinna, Davide Fiore Bavaro, Vincenzo Scaglione, Benedetta Fumarola, Gabriele Pagani, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa and Michele Bartoletti have nothing to declare. Matteo Bassetti and Daniele Roberto Giacobbe are Editorial Board members of Infectious Diseases and Therapy. Matteo Bassetti and Daniele Roberto Giacobbe were not involved in the selection of peer reviewers for the manuscript nor any of the subsequent editorial decisions. Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the institutional review board of the coordinating centre (Comitato Etico interaziendale, City of Health and Sciences, Turin, pratica no. 202/2023, PROT.N. 0066633) and was in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was deemed unnecessary due to the retrospective nature of the study. STROBE recommendations were followed.

References

    1. Chang YT, Lin CY, Chen YH, Hsueh PR. Update on infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with particular attention to resistance mechanisms and therapeutic options. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:893. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00893. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mojica MF, Humphries R, Lipuma JJ, et al. Clinical challenges treating Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: an update. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022;4(3):dlac040. 10.1093/jacamr/dlac040. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paez JI, Costa SF. Risk factors associated with mortality of infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70(2):101–8. 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.05.020. - PubMed
    1. Osawa K, Shigemura K, Kitagawa K, Tokimatsu I, Fujisawa M. Risk factors for death from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia. J Infect Chemother. 2018;24(8):632–6. 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.03.011. - PubMed
    1. Jeon YD, Jeong WY, Kim MH, et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(31): e4375. 10.1097/MD.0000000000004375. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources