Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;19(3):380-388.
doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0447. Epub 2025 Mar 4.

Pelvic ring ratio: a novel indicator of comprehensive pelvic alignment assessment

Affiliations

Pelvic ring ratio: a novel indicator of comprehensive pelvic alignment assessment

Hiroaki Nakashima et al. Asian Spine J. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Study design: A cross-sectional study.

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of the pelvic ring ratio as an indicator for assessing pelvic tilt (PT) from the frontal view and explore its correlation with various whole-body sagittal alignment (WBSA) parameters using EOS imaging technology.

Overview of literature: Traditional indicators of PT often rely on sagittal plane measurements, which can be challenging in cases of pelvic rotation or obesity. A new indicator such as the pelvic ring ratio could address these challenges and aid in the comprehensive assessment of pelvic alignment.

Methods: In total, 104 healthy participants (28 men, 76 women; mean age, 52.8±12.3 years) with no spinal disorders were recruited. Whole-body radiography using the EOS imaging system was performed to obtain sagittal and coronal parameters, including the pelvic ring ratio. Intra- and interobserver variability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) based on measurements by three spine surgery specialists. Correlation analyses among the pelvic ring ratio, age, body mass index, and WBSA parameters were conducted, and a multiple linear regression model was developed to predict PT.

Results: The mean pelvic ring ratio was 53.3%±11.5%. The intra- and interobserver ICCs were 0.89 and 0.87, respectively, indicating good reliability. The pelvic ring ratio was negatively correlated with age (r =-0.387, p <0.05) and PT (r =-0.598, p <0.05). The regression model revealed that the pelvic ring ratio and sex significantly predicted PT (p <0.05). Women had higher pelvic ring ratio (55.0%±11.3%) than men (48.6%±10.8%).

Conclusions: The pelvic ring ratio is a reliable and valuable indicator for PT assessment from the frontal view. It exhibits significant correlations with age and certain WBSA parameters, showing potential to improving the diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning for patients with spinal and hip disorders.

Keywords: Adult spinal deformity; Lower limb alignment; Pelvic ring ratio; Pelvic tilt; Sagittal alignment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram showing the measurement of the pelvic ring ratio. The pelvic ring ratio was determined by measuring the vertical distance from the line connecting the lower ends of the sacroiliac joints to the cranial edge of the pubic symphysis, along with the horizontal diameter of the pelvic ring, on a frontal radiograph and then calculating the ratio of these measurements.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A 71-year-old female with a pelvic ring ratio of 53.3%. Pelvic parameters: pelvic incidence, 61.7°; pelvic tilt, 25.4°; and lumbar lordosis, 46.8°. Additionally, the patient exhibited knee flexion of 5.9° and an ankle angle of 6.6°.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A 45-year-old female with a pelvic ring ratio of 71.7%. Pelvic parameters: pelvic incidence, 45.8°; pelvic tilt, 6.2°; and lumbar lordosis, 62.7°. Additionally, the patient exhibited knee flexion of 4.8° and an ankle angle of 6.1°.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Histogram of the pelvic ring ratio. The mean pelvic ring ratio was 53.3%±11.5%, showing a normal distribution.
None

References

    1. Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, et al. Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:1082–5. - PubMed
    1. Diebo BG, Shah NV, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Adult spinal deformity. Lancet. 2019;394:160–72. - PubMed
    1. Ames C, Gammal I, Matsumoto M, et al. Geographic and ethnic variations in radiographic disability thresholds: analysis of North American and Japanese operative adult spinal deformity populations. Neurosurgery. 2016;78:793–801. - PubMed
    1. Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, et al. Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E803–12. - PubMed
    1. Nakashima H, Kawakami N, Ohara T, Saito T, Tauchi R, Imagama S. A new global spinal balance classification based on individual pelvic anatomical measurements in patients with adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021;46:223–31. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources