Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun:426:132329.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132329. Epub 2025 Mar 2.

Influence of vapothermal and hydrothermal pre-treatment on anaerobic degradability of lignocellulosic biomass

Affiliations
Free article

Influence of vapothermal and hydrothermal pre-treatment on anaerobic degradability of lignocellulosic biomass

Jana Schultz et al. Bioresour Technol. 2025 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

This study compares the biogas potential of solid common reed residues after undergoing vapothermal and hydrothermal pre-treatment, accompanied by a compositional and structural biomass characterization. In a pre-test series, a design of experiments approach was used to determine the influence of the initial biomass water content during vapothermal pre-treatment on the biogas yield. In the main test series, common reed was pre-treated hydrothermally (i.e., in liquid water) and vapothermally (i.e., in saturated steam) while varying temperature and residence time. The initial biomass water content significantly impacted the biogas potential, with an optimum at a value of 32 to 46 wt-%FM. In the main test series, unlike the residence time, temperature significantly impacted the subsequent anaerobic digestion. Vapothermal pre-treatment had a narrow temperature optimum while hydrothermal pre-treatment led to a biogas increase in a broader temperature range. The optimum temperature of both methods was 170 °C, where methane potentials increased by 28 % (vapothermal) and 36 % (hydrothermal) compared to the untreated sample. Considering the mass loss occurring during the pre-treatment, this increase was still 18 % for vapothermal pre-treatment, while it diminished the increase to 6 % for hydrothermal pre-treatment. Overall, vapothermal pre-treatment produced a similar amount of biogas under comparable conditions, but was less susceptible to carbon loss, and, according to an estimation of the required process energy, may offer energy savings compared to hydrothermal pre-treatment.

Keywords: Agricultural residues; Anaerobic digestion; Biomass valorization; Biomethane; Lignocellulose; Liquid hot water; Steam pre-treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Jana Schultz reports financial support was provided by German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Martin Kaltschmitt, Marvin Scherzinger, Timo Steinbrecher reports financial support was provided by German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. Asli Isci reports financial support was provided by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

LinkOut - more resources