Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Aug 19;110(5):512-519.
doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327282.

A novel human milk fortifier supports adequate growth in very low birth weight infants: a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A novel human milk fortifier supports adequate growth in very low birth weight infants: a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

Jean-Charles Picaud et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare growth, tolerance and safety parameters in very preterm infants receiving human milk (HM) fortified with a multicomponent cow's milk-based HM fortifier (HMF; control) versus a novel HMF-containing lipids (including docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid), higher protein and lower carbohydrate levels (test). Our hypothesis was that weight growth velocity in the test group would be non-inferior to that in the control group.

Design: Double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Nine European neonatal intensive care units.

Patients: HM-fed infants born at <32-week gestational age.

Interventions: Fortification of HM with Test or Control HMF for a minimum of 21 days.

Primary outcome: Weight growth velocity between baseline and intervention day 21.

Results: From March 2018 to July 2020, 102 and 103 infants were enrolled in the test and control groups, respectively. Weight growth velocity during the first 21 days in the test group (mean 18.4 g/kg/day) was non-inferior to that of controls (mean 18.5 g/kg/day), with a difference in estimated means of -0.175 g/kg/day (90% CI -1.34 to +0.99 g/kg/day; per-protocol population). No significant differences between groups were observed for gain in length, head circumference or anthropometric Z-scores. Rates of digestive intolerance, stool frequency and consistency were comparable. No significant differences were reported in common neonatal morbidities including necrotising enterocolitis (test: 2.9%, control: 6.9%, mean difference -4.0% (95% CI -11.1% to 2.2%); all subjects treated population).

Conclusions: Use of the novel HMF containing lipids, higher protein and lower carbohydrate levels supports adequate postnatal growth and appears safe and well tolerated in very preterm infants.

Trial registration number: NCT03315221.

Keywords: Growth; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal; Neonatology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: EvdH, AG and AB are employees of Danone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands. PC declares unrestricted research funding paid to his employing institution (NNUHFT) by Danone Early Life Nutrition, and conference travel and accommodation reimbursements received from Nutricia and Nestle in 2018–19. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest relevant for this study to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Subject flow. HMF, human milk fortifier. Allocated subjects were siblings assigned to the same group. #One subject randomised to the Control group received Test HMF. 3Noncompliance with study: subjects with major protocol deviations: A. Major violation of the inclusion or exclusion criteria: n=0. B. Non-compliance with study product intake, as indicated by exposure to study product for <21 days: n=50. C. Not having any post-baseline measurements of weight – no additional exclusions. 4PP subjects were all subjects without major protocol deviations.

References

    1. Arslanoglu S, Boquien C-Y, King C, et al. Fortification of Human Milk for Preterm Infants: Update and Recommendations of the European Milk Bank Association (EMBA) Working Group on Human Milk Fortification. Front Pediatr . 2019;7:76. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00076. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Embleton ND, Jennifer Moltu S, Lapillonne A, et al. Enteral Nutrition in Preterm Infants (2022): A Position Paper From the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition and Invited Experts. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2023;76:248–68. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003642. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown JV, Lin L, Embleton ND, et al. Multi-nutrient fortification of human milk for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;6:CD000343. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000343.pub4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Embleton ND. Optimal protein and energy intakes in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2007;83:831–7. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.10.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Picaud JC, Vincent M, Buffin R. In: Nutritional care of preterm infants scientific basis and practical guidelines. Koletzko B, Cheah F-C, Domellöf M, et al., editors. Vol. 122. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 2021. Human milk fortification for preterm infants: a review; pp. 225–47.

Publication types

Associated data