Safety and Efficacy of Single Femoral Vein Puncture Technique for Double Access in Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Under ICE Guidance-A Single Center Experience of the "Two-In-One Technique"
- PMID: 40038892
- PMCID: PMC12057306
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.31479
Safety and Efficacy of Single Femoral Vein Puncture Technique for Double Access in Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Under ICE Guidance-A Single Center Experience of the "Two-In-One Technique"
Abstract
Background: In selected patient populations, percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale has been shown to be beneficial in preventing cerebral ischaemic events. In most cases, this procedure requires echocardiographic guidance, which may be transesophageal, transthoracic or intracardiac. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has the advantage of not requiring general anaesthesia but usually requires a second vascular access.
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the single femoral vein puncture technique for double veinous access compared to conventional bilateral double puncture during patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure under intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) guidance.
Methods: A retrospective study including all patients who underwent PFO closure under ICE guidance between January 2018 and April 2024 in University Hospital of Dijon, comparing the single puncture technique, defined as a single vascular hole for two sheaths, with those who underwent bilateral puncture. We collected baseline patient characteristics as well as intra- and post-procedural data, especially significant vascular complications (bleeding, false aneurysm, deep vein thrombosis, arteriovenous fistula) and procedural success (defined as successful placement of the prosthesis, meeting stability criteria, without embolization). In addition, patients were asked to rate the comfort of the procedure on a scale of 0 to 10 after the procedure.
Results: We analyzed 179 consecutive patients, of whom 126 received a femoral vein approach using the two-in-one technique and 53 received a bilateral femoral vein puncture. PFO closure was successful in all cases regardless of group. No tamponade, device migration, or death was observed during hospitalization. Vascular complication rate was comparable (3 (1.6%) vs. 2 (3.8%); p = 0.582). In addition, the single puncture technique was associated with an increased comfort score compared with the bilateral puncture technique (9.20 ± 1.55 vs. 8.44 ± 1.93; p = 0.044), shorter procedure time (40 min [32; 50] vs. 60 min [48; 70]; p < 0.001), hospital stay duration (0.82 ± 1.02 days vs. 2.04 ± 0.83 days; p < 0.001) and fluoroscopy time (5.71 min [4.28; 8.33] vs. 9.57 min [7.42; 13.11]; p < 0.001).
Conclusion: The single femoral vein puncture technique for double femoral vein access is safe and effective for PFO closure under ICE guidance. It is also associated with increased patient comfort and reduced fluoroscopy time, although large multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results.
Keywords: ICE; PFO closure; intracardiac echocardiography; local anesthesia; vascular access.
© 2025 The Author(s). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Patent foramen ovale closure without echocardiographic control: use of "standby" intracardiac ultrasound.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Aug;1(4):387-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.05.006. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. PMID: 19463334
-
Percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure using Helex and Amplatzer devices without intraprocedural echocardiographic guidance.J Interv Cardiol. 2011 Jun;24(3):271-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2010.00612.x. Epub 2010 Nov 28. J Interv Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21114532
-
Safety and feasibility of day case patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure facilitated by intracardiac echocardiography.Int J Cardiol. 2009 Jan 24;131(3):438-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.07.141. Epub 2007 Nov 26. Int J Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 18037512
-
Impact of Percutaneous Closure of Interatrial Shunts on Migraine Attacks: Single-Operator Series and Review of the Literature.Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2017;12(2):129-138. doi: 10.2174/1574887112666170328124939. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2017. PMID: 28356032 Review.
-
Practical Aspects of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Ultrasound and Fluoroscopic Guidance.Cardiol Clin. 2024 Nov;42(4):537-545. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Mar 13. Cardiol Clin. 2024. PMID: 39322344 Review.
References
-
- Hagen P. T., Scholz D. G., and Edwards W. D., “Incidence and Size of Patent Foramen Ovale During the First 10 Decades of Life: An Autopsy Study of 965 Normal Hearts,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings 59 (1984): 17–20. - PubMed
-
- Lee P. H., Song J. K., Kim J. S., et al., “Cryptogenic Stroke and High‐Risk Patent Foramen Ovale,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology 71 (2018): 2335–2342. - PubMed
-
- Mas J.‐L., Derumeaux G., Guillon B., et al., “Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelets After Stroke,” New England Journal of Medicine 377 (2017): 1011–1021. - PubMed
-
- Søndergaard L., Kasner S. E., Rhodes J. F., et al., “Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke,” New England Journal of Medicine 377 (2017): 1033–1042. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous