Insurance coverage for mental illness: A review through a lens of bioethics and the MHCA, 2017
- PMID: 40040406
- DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2024.072
Insurance coverage for mental illness: A review through a lens of bioethics and the MHCA, 2017
Abstract
Introduction: Health insurance coverage can serve as protection against catastrophic health expenditures. Section 21 (4) of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 (MHCA) mandates insurance coverage for mental illness to be on par with that for physical illness. Despite this, anecdotal evidence shows persons with mental health conditions are routinely denied or face difficulties in obtaining medical insurance coverage due to their mental illness.
Method: We undertook an analysis of all insurance policy documents published on the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) webpage for the year 2020-21 to examine their relevance to mental illness and to examine how the policy wording adheres to Section 21 (4) of the MHCA and the core principles of bioethics.
Results: We sourced 459 health insurance policies for the year 2020-21 from the IRDAI webpage. Of these, 268 relevant insurance policies were analysed in depth for their adherence to the MHCA guidelines and principles of bioethics. Of the policies analysed (n=268) we found six policies (from two insurance providers) explicitly excluded mental illness across all domains, in direct contradiction of the MHCA and the subsequent guidance issued by the IRDAI. Most insurance policies excluded coverage for injuries due to attempted suicide or self-injury (n=224), or alcohol consumption/substance use (n=267). Out-patient services were included in 23 policies.
Discussion: Health insurance policies continue to contain discriminatory terms for mental illness thus violating the principle of parity put forth by the MHCA and at odds with core principles of bioethics. Sustained advocacy efforts are required to ensure insurance providers abide by the principles of parity in letter and in spirit to remove differential or discriminatory terms for mental illness in their policies in compliance with Section 21 (4) the MHCA.
Similar articles
-
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of cap and co-payment on rational drug use.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 08;(5):CD007017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007017.pub2. PMID: 18254125 Updated.
-
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025. PMID: 40493548 Free PMC article.
-
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34706066 Free PMC article.
-
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532236
-
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025. PMID: 40548558
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical