Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 31:5:104198.
doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104198. eCollection 2025.

Spinal metastases at the thoracolumbar junction - Influencing factors for surgical decision-making according to a multicentric registry

Affiliations

Spinal metastases at the thoracolumbar junction - Influencing factors for surgical decision-making according to a multicentric registry

Vanessa Hubertus et al. Brain Spine. .

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal metastases at the thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) pose a significant risk for spinal instability and necessitate special considerations regarding surgical management. Longer patient survival due to improved oncologic therapies may justify extensive instrumented surgery.

Research question: The aim of this study was to analyze the standard of care in a large multicentric cohort of patients with TLJ metastases regarding surgical decision-making, management, and associated morbidity.

Material and methods: Patients with surgically treated spinal metastases at the TLJ between 2010 and 2022 were enrolled at five academic tertiary spine centers. Epidemiological, surgical, clinical, and outcome data was assessed retrospectively. Surgical management was sorted according to three groups: decompression ( i ), decompression and posterior instrumentation ( ii ), and decompression and 360° instrumentation with vertebral body replacement ( iii ). Sole biopsies or kypho-/vertebroplasties were excluded.

Results: The inclusion criteria was met by 396 patients, of which 59 (15%) were treated with decompression ( i ), 235 (59%) with posterior instrumentation ( ii ), and 102 (26%) with additional vertebral body replacement ( iii ). The main factor for selection towards instrumentation was a higher SINS score (SINS 9 in ii , 10 in iii vs. 7 in i , p < 0.0001). Surgical complications occurred in 55 cases (14%), slightly more frequent following instrumentations (15% ii, iii vs. 8% i , p = 0.427). Reoperations were necessary in 65 cases (16%), mostly due to SSI (n = 19, 29%), local recurrence (n = 15, 23%), and hardware failure (HWF) during follow-up (n = 9, 18%, i-iii , p = 0.7853). HWF occurred significantly more frequent in cases with multisegmental metastases at the TLJ (p = 0.0002) which were treated with longer constructs (p = 0.0092). Median postoperative survival was 10 months. The occurrence of complications reduced postoperative survival drastically in all groups (p = 0.0023).

Discussion and conclusion: In this large multicentric patient cohort with TLJ metastases, the majority of patients (85%) were treated with instrumented spine surgery. The main factor for patient selection towards instrumented surgery was a higher SINS score. Long instrumentations for multisegmental disease at the TLJ were identified with higher risk for hardware-failure during follow-up. In those patients, frequent follow-up imaging is warranted. As postoperative survival is drastically reduced by the occurrence of postoperative complications, it is imperative to carefully select the individually appropriate extent of surgery in order to avoid postoperative complications.

Keywords: Spinal metastasis; Spinal oncology; Spine instrumentation; Thoracolumbar junction; surgical indication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of study recruitment and surgical groups.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Data on the occurrence of hardware-failure during clinical follow-up in the instrumented groups (ii, iii), and relation to the length of instrumentations. a Occurrence of Hardware-failure during clinical follow-up in groups ii (n = 16) and iii (n = 3), b-e length of instrumentation in the different instrumented groups (b) and relation to the occurrence of hardware-failure during clinical follow-up in groups ii and iii (c), group ii (d), and group iii (e). Statistics: Student's t-test. Abbreviations: HWF – Hardware-failure. Statistics: Student's t-test. Abbreviation: HWF – Hardware failure.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Postoperative survival (%) in months depending on the occurrence of postoperative complications (p = 0.0023). Statistics: Kaplan Meier survival analysis with log-rank test for between-group differences.

References

    1. Ahmed A.K., Goodwin C.R., Heravi A., et al. Predicting survival for metastatic spine disease: a comparison of nine scoring systems. Spine J. 2018;0(0) doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amelot A., Balabaud L., Choi D., et al. Surgery for metastatic spine tumors in the elderly. Advanced age is not a contraindication to surgery. Spine J. 2017;17(6):759–767. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.440. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atkinson R.A., Davies B., Jones A., van Popta D., Ousey K., Stephenson J. Survival of patients undergoing surgery for metastatic spinal tumours and the impact of surgical site infection. J. Hosp. Infect. 2016;94(1):80–85. doi: 10.1016/J.JHIN.2016.06.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barzilai O, Versteeg AL, Sahgal A, et al. Survival, local control, and health-related quality of life in patients with oligometastatic and polymetastatic spinal tumors: a multicenter, international study. Cancer. Published online November 29, 2018. doi:10.1002/cncr.31870. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barzilai O., Fisher C.G., Bilsky M.H. State of the art treatment of spinal metastatic disease. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(6):757–769. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx567. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources