Determining safe washout period for immune checkpoint inhibitors prior to liver transplantation: An international retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 40042053
- DOI: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001289
Determining safe washout period for immune checkpoint inhibitors prior to liver transplantation: An international retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background and aims: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used in patients with advanced HCC patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT). However, concerns about the risk of posttransplant rejection persist.
Approach and results: We conducted an international retrospective cohort study including 119 HCC patients who received ICIs prior to LT. We analyzed the incidence of allograft rejection, graft loss, and posttransplant recurrence with a particular focus on the washout period between the last ICI dose and LT. In this study, 24 of the 119 (20.2%) patients experienced allograft rejection with a median time to rejection of 9 days (IQR 6-10) post-LT. A linear relationship was observed between shorter washout periods and higher rejection risk. Washout periods <30 days (OR: 21.3, 95% CI: 5.93-103, p< 0.001) and between 30 and 50 days (OR: 9.48, 95% CI 2.47-46.8, p =0.002) were significantly associated with higher rejection rates in the univariate analysis compared to the washout period above 50 days. Graft loss as a result of rejection occurred in 6 patients (25%) with rejection. No factors related to grafts were associated with rejection. A longer washout period was not associated with a lower recurrence-free survival posttransplantation at 36 months (71% vs. 67%, p =0.71).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a washout period longer than 50 days for ICIs before LT appears to be safe with respect to rejection risk. While these results may help guide clinical decision-making, future prospective studies are essential to establish definitive guidelines.
Keywords: HCC; immune checkpoint inhibitor; liver transplantation; recurrence; rejection.
Copyright © 2025 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
References
-
- Galle PR, Forner A, Llovet JM, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Raoul JL, et al. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182–236.
-
- Moeckli B, Ivanics T, Claasen M, Toso C, Sapisochin G. Recent developments and ongoing trials in transplant oncology. Liver Int. 2020;40:2326–2344.
-
- Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado Á, et al. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: The 2022 update. J Hepatol. 2022;76:681–693.
-
- Dall’Olio FG, Marabelle A, Caramella C, Garcia C, Aldea M, Chaput N, et al. Tumour burden and efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19:75–90.
-
- Robert C. A decade of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in cancer therapy. Nat Commun. 2020;11:3801.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources