Predictors of mood disturbance in older adults: a longitudinal cohort study
- PMID: 40042774
- DOI: 10.1007/s41999-025-01178-z
Predictors of mood disturbance in older adults: a longitudinal cohort study
Abstract
Purpose: Given the significant mental health challenges faced by the aging population, this study aimed to identify key predictors of mood disturbances among older adults, focusing on socioeconomic, health, and cognitive factors.
Methods: This post-hoc analysis utilized publicly available data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a nationally representative longitudinal cohort study conducted in the United States. The analysis included 2,820 adults aged 65 years and above who were followed for three years (age average range 75-79 years, 54.7% female).
Results: During the follow-up period, 21.8% of participants developed new-onset mood disturbances. High-income status is associated with decreased risk (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.96), while being Black showed a risk effect compared to White participants (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.06-1.29). With not good health status (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.04-2.41), without presence of diabetes (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.95), and poor memory status (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.10-4.15) were significant predictors. Without fear of falling (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97) and increased physical performance (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.98) also decreased risk. Income-stratified analysis revealed that low-income groups were particularly affected by cognitive function, middle-income by health status, and high-income by physical activity levels.
Conclusion: Socioeconomic status, race, health conditions, and cognitive function are significant predictors of mood disturbances in older adults. These findings suggest the importance of developing targeted interventions based on income levels and addressing modifiable risk factors.
Keywords: Anxiety; Depression; Mood disturbance.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Geriatric Medicine Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethics approval and consent to participate: NHATS was approved by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Institutional Review Board. Informed consent was obtained from the NHATS participants. This current study was exempt from an institutional ethical review because it involved a publicly available dataset. Informed consent: Not required.
References
-
- Chen C et al (2024) A global analysis of adaptation to societal aging across low-, middle- and high-income countries using the Global Aging Society Index. Nat Aging. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-024-00772-3 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- WHO (2023) Mental health of older adults. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-of-older-...
-
- Wienand D et al (2024) Comorbid physical health burden of serious mental health disorders in 32 European countries. BMJ Ment Health 27(1):e301021. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2024-301021 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Xu Y et al (2024) Association between depressive symptoms and cognitive function in the older population, and the mediating role of neurofilament light chain: evidence from NHANES 2013–2014. J Affect Disord 360:221–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.165 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hayley S, Hakim AM, Albert PR (2021) Depression, dementia and immune dysregulation. Brain 144(3):746–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa405 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical